Toyota Previa 2.4 Standard AT (White Pearl) (2014) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Previa 2.4 Standard AT (White Pearl) (2014) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Previa 2.4 Standard AT (White Pearl) (2014) Toyota ₱2,468,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱2,145,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2014 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2362cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, VVT-I | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 170 PS @ 6000 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 224 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | SUV |
| Segment | M | J |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4795 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1800 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1730 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2950 | 2845 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1775 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.5" Alloys | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.5" Alloys | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 215/55 R17 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 215/55 R17 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Power Asisted |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Foot brake | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry & Alarm | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota Previa 2.4 Standard AT (White Pearl) (2014) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, power, and practicality between the 2014 Toyota Previa 2.4 Standard AT and the 2018 Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×4, the choice hinges on driving needs and budget. The Previa is priced at ₱2,468,000, slightly higher than the mu‑X’s ₱2,145,000. However, the Previa offers a 170 PS gasoline engine with 224 Nm torque and a 4‑speed automatic, suitable for city commuting and light family use. Its van body with 2+2+3 seating provides more passenger capacity for up to seven, making it ideal for larger families or group travel. The mu‑X, on the other hand, delivers 177 PS diesel power and a hefty 380 Nm torque with a turbo‑intercooler, coupled with a 6‑speed automatic and 4WD drivetrain—better suited for rough roads, off‑road adventures, or heavy-duty tasks. It seats 2+3+2 (seven people) but in an SUV layout, offering more cargo space and a higher stance. Both vehicles share similar warranties (100,000 km/3 years) and are unibody constructions. If the buyer prioritizes off‑road capability, diesel efficiency, and a modern SUV experience, the mu‑X is preferable. If passenger capacity in a van form factor and slightly higher power from gasoline are more important, the Previa is the better fit. Ultimately, budget and intended use will dictate the best choice.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×4 is priced at ₱2,145,000, while the Toyota Previa 2.4 Standard AT costs ₱2,468,000.
Which has more power?
The mu‑X offers 177 PS and 380 Nm torque, slightly higher than the Previa’s 170 PS and 224 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Previa’s gasoline engine and 4‑speed automatic may be more fuel‑efficient for city driving, but the mu‑X’s diesel engine provides better torque for varied conditions.
Which vehicle offers more passenger capacity?
Both seat seven (2+3+2 for mu‑X, 2+2+3 for Previa), but the Previa’s van body may allow easier access for larger groups.