Toyota Vios 1.3 E AT (2014) vs Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Vios 1.3 E AT (2014) vs Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Vios 1.3 E AT (2014) Toyota ₱778,000 | Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) Suzuki ₱820,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2014 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1299cc | 1590cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 86 PS @ 6000 rpm | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm |
| Max Torque | 122 Nm @ 4400 rpm | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | 4-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | MPV |
| Segment | B | M |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4410 | 4230 |
| Width (mm) | 1700 | 1655 |
| Height (mm) | 1475 | 1855 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2550 | 2625 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1300 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 46 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs |
| Front Wheels | 15" Alloys | 14x5.5" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 15" Alloys | 14x5.5" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 185/60 R15 | 185/60 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 185/60 R15 | 185/60 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Toyota Vios 1.3 E AT (2014) vs Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for the most economical and practical daily commuter, the 2014 Toyota Vios 1.3 E AT is the better choice. It comes in at ₱778,000—₱42,000 cheaper than the Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT—and offers a 4‑speed automatic that is more familiar to most drivers. The Vios’ inline‑4 DOHC 16‑valve engine delivers 86 PS at 6000 rpm and 122 Nm torque, which is slightly less than the APV’s 91 PS/127 Nm but still adequate for city driving. Its FWD layout and sedan body type provide a smoother ride on uneven roads, while the 4‑door configuration comfortably seats five with a 2+3 layout. The APV, priced at ₱820,000, is an MPV with a larger 1590cc SOHC engine that produces more power and torque, but its RWD body‑on‑frame construction makes it heavier and less efficient on tight city streets. It offers a 5‑door layout with a 2+2+3 seating arrangement, which might appeal to families needing more rear space. However, the higher price and RWD drivetrain make it less suitable for everyday commuting in urban areas. Overall, if you prioritize affordability, fuel efficiency, and a smoother ride for daily use, the Toyota Vios is the recommended pick; if you need more power and a larger MPV layout for occasional family trips, consider the Suzuki APV.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Toyota Vios 1.3 E AT costs ₱778,000, while the Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT is priced at ₱820,000.
Which has more power?
The Suzuki APV’s 1590cc engine produces 91 PS, slightly higher than the Vios’ 86 PS from its 1299cc engine.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Vios, with its FWD sedan layout and lower price, offers a smoother ride and better fuel efficiency for city driving.
Which vehicle has more seating capacity?
Both seat five, but the Vios uses a 2+3 layout while the APV offers a 2+2+3 configuration across five doors.