Toyota Vios 1.3 E MT (2014) vs Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Vios 1.3 E MT (2014) vs Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Vios 1.3 E MT (2014) Toyota ₱743,000 | Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) Suzuki ₱820,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2014 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1299cc | 1590cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 86 PS @ 6000 rpm | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm |
| Max Torque | 122 Nm @ 4400 rpm | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 4-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | MPV |
| Segment | B | M |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4410 | 4230 |
| Width (mm) | 1700 | 1655 |
| Height (mm) | 1475 | 1855 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2550 | 2625 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1300 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 46 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs |
| Front Wheels | 15" Alloys | 14x5.5" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 15" Alloys | 14x5.5" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 185/60 R15 | 185/60 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 185/60 R15 | 185/60 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Toyota Vios 1.3 E MT (2014) vs Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015): which should you buy?
The Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (₱820,000) offers better value for Filipino buyers seeking practicality and space, while the Toyota Vios 1.3 E MT (₱743,000) is more economical for budget-conscious owners. The APV’s 1590cc engine delivers 91 PS vs. 86 PS, supporting its 2+2+3 seating capacity, making it suitable for families. The Vios’ 4410mm length gives slightly more interior space, but the APV’s 4-speed automatic transmission and rear-wheel-drive layout enhance practicality. Both have identical 100,000km/3-year warranties, but the APV’s higher price reflects superior practicality and configuration. Choose the APV if you prioritize versatility and family use; opt for the Vios for cost efficiency and urban reliability.