Aston Martin DB9 Coupe V12 GT (2015) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Aston Martin DB9 Coupe V12 GT (2015) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Aston Martin DB9 Coupe V12 GT (2015) Aston Martin | Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) Ford ₱3,499,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | Unlimited Mileage/3 years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V12 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 5935cc | — |
| Valvetrain | Quad Overhead Cam 48 Valve | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally aspirated | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 547 PS @ 6750 rpm | 394 PS |
| Max Torque | 620 Nm @ 5500 rpm | 676 Nm |
| Transmission | 6 Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 4.5 secs | — |
| Top Speed | 295 km/h | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | 13.4 mpg | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | 28.8 mpg | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 20.2 mpg | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | S | SUV |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4720 | 4713 |
| Width (mm) | 2061 | 1881 |
| Height (mm) | 1282 | 1627 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2740 | 2984 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1785 | 2084 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Shadow Black, Star White, Velocity Blue Metallic, Glacier Gray, Grabber Yellow |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent double wishbone (3 Stage Adaptive Damping) | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Independent double wishbone (3 Stage Adaptive Damping) | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 20" Alloys | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 20" Alloys | 19 |
| Front Tires | 245/35/20 | 225/55R19 |
| Rear Tires | 295/30/20 | 225/55R19 |
| Front Brakes | Carbon Ceramic | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Carbon Ceramic | Disc |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Steering Ratio | Hydraulic | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Conventional | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 9 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Bi-Xenon | LED |
| Fog Lights | No | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Aston Martin DB9 Coupe V12 GT (2015) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing performance, practicality, and cost, the Ford Mustang Mach‑E Premium AWD emerges as the more sensible choice. It is a current model with a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty and is priced at ₱3,499,000, whereas the Aston Martin DB9 Coupe V12 GT is discontinued and has no price listed. In terms of power, the DB9 delivers 547 PS at 6,750 rpm and 620 Nm torque at 5,500 rpm from a massive 5,935 cc V12, while the Mach‑E’s electric motor produces 394 PS and a higher torque of 676 Nm, offering strong acceleration for an electric SUV. The DB9’s 0–100 km/h time of 4.5 s and top speed of 295 km/h highlight its pure performance pedigree, but it lacks modern convenience features such as AWD, a 5‑door layout, and the practicality of a midsize crossover. The Mach‑E’s AWD drivetrain, 5‑door configuration, and seating for five make it more suitable for daily commuting, family use, or longer trips. Fuel economy is not directly comparable due to the DB9’s gasoline consumption figures (13.4 mpg city, 28.8 mpg highway) versus the Mach‑E’s electric range not provided; however, the electric powertrain typically offers lower operating costs. Overall, buyers seeking a high‑performance luxury coupe with no practical daily use will gravitate toward the DB9, while those prioritizing affordability, versatility, and modern electric technology should choose the Mustang Mach‑E.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Mustang Mach‑E Premium AWD has a listed price of ₱3,499,000. The Aston Martin DB9 Coupe V12 GT has no price listed and is discontinued, so its cost cannot be determined from the data.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Aston Martin DB9 produces 547 PS and 620 Nm torque, while the Mustang Mach‑E delivers 394 PS and 676 Nm torque. The DB9 has higher peak power, but the Mach‑E offers higher torque.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
The Mustang Mach‑E, with its AWD drivetrain, 5‑door layout, and seating for five, is more practical for daily commuting. The DB9’s coupe body and limited practicality make it less suited for everyday use.
Which vehicle offers better fuel efficiency?
Fuel economy data is only provided for the DB9 (13.4 mpg city, 28.8 mpg highway). No fuel economy or range data is provided for the Mustang Mach‑E, so a direct comparison cannot be made from the available information.