Audi A3 1.8 TFSI DCT (2015) vs Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Audi A3 1.8 TFSI DCT (2015) vs Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Audi A3 1.8 TFSI DCT (2015) Audi ₱2,790,000 | Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱2,288,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-5 |
| Displacement | 1798cc | 3198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 20-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Turbocharged CRDI |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 180 PS @ 5100-6200 rpm | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 250 Nm @ 1250-5000 rpm | 470 Nm @ 1750 rpm |
| Transmission | 7-Speed DCT | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | 4WD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 7.3 secs | — |
| Top Speed | 242 km/h | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | 40.4 (7.0) | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | 58.9 (4.8) | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 50.4 (5.6) | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Segment | C | J |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4292 | 4893 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1862 |
| Height (mm) | 1423 | 1836 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2578 | 2850 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1600 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Double Wishbone |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Live Axle |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.5" Alloys | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.5" Alloys | 20 |
| Front Tires | 225/45 R17 | 265/50 R20 |
| Rear Tires | 225/45 R17 | 265/50 R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Height adjust | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 10 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Audi A3 1.8 TFSI DCT (2015) vs Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, choosing between the Audi A3 1.8 TFSI DCT (2015) and Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) depends entirely on lifestyle and priorities. The Audi A3 is a premium compact sedan priced at ₱2,790,000, offering a sporty 180 PS turbo gasoline engine with a quick 7.3-second 0-100 km/h time and excellent combined fuel economy of 50.4 km/L (5.6 L/100 km). It's ideal for daily commuting in Metro Manila, where parking and maneuverability are key, and for those who value badge prestige and driving dynamics. However, it's discontinued, has only 2-year unlimited warranty, and seats 5 with limited cargo space. The Ford Everest, at a lower ₱2,288,000, is a current-model, body-on-frame SUV with a torquey 200 PS diesel engine and 4WD capability, making it perfect for large families (up to 7 seats), frequent provincial trips, or off-road adventures. Its 470 Nm torque is excellent for towing or rough terrain. The trade-off is lower fuel economy (not specified in city/highway) and higher maintenance costs typical of a large SUV. If you need a fun daily driver and can afford the premium sedan, choose the Audi. If you need a versatile, off-road-capable family hauler with lower upfront cost, go with the Ford Everest.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper: Audi A3 or Ford Everest?
The Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4x4 AT (2017) is cheaper at ₱2,288,000 compared to the Audi A3 1.8 TFSI DCT (2015) at ₱2,790,000.
Which is more powerful: Audi A3 or Ford Everest?
The Ford Everest has higher torque (470 Nm) while the Audi A3 has higher horsepower (180 PS). For raw pulling power, Everest wins; for speed, the Audi is quicker (0-100 in 7.3 secs vs unspecified for Everest).
Which is better for daily commuting in the city?
The Audi A3 is better for daily commuting due to its compact sedan body, better fuel economy (50.4 km/L combined), and easier parking, whereas the Ford Everest is larger and less efficient.
Which vehicle can seat more people?
The Ford Everest seats up to 7 passengers (2+3+2 configuration), while the Audi A3 is a 5-seater sedan.