Audi A3 2.0 Attraction DCT (2015) vs Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Audi A3 2.0 Attraction DCT (2015) vs Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Audi A3 2.0 Attraction DCT (2015) Audi ₱2,630,000 | Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱2,288,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-5 |
| Displacement | 1968cc | 3198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 20-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler CRDI | Turbocharged CRDI |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 3500-4000 rpm | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 320 Nm @ 1750-3000 rpm | 470 Nm @ 1750 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed DCT | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | 4WD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 8.4 secs | — |
| Top Speed | 219 km/h | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | 54.3 (5.2) | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | 70.6 (4.0) | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 64.2 (4.4) | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Segment | C | J |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4292 | 4893 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1862 |
| Height (mm) | 1423 | 1836 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2578 | 2850 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1600 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Double Wishbone |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Live Axle |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.5" Alloys | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.5" Alloys | 20 |
| Front Tires | 225/45 R17 | 265/50 R20 |
| Rear Tires | 225/45 R17 | 265/50 R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Height adjust | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 10 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Audi A3 2.0 Attraction DCT (2015) vs Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Audi A3 2.0 Attraction DCT (2015) and the Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4x4 AT (2017) hinges on your lifestyle and priorities. The Audi A3 is a compact luxury sedan priced at ₱2,630,000, offering a refined diesel engine with 150 PS and 320 Nm, paired with a 6-speed DCT for sporty driving. It achieves excellent fuel economy (5.2 km/L city, 4.0 km/L highway) and a 0-100 km/h time of 8.4 seconds, ideal for daily commuting and city driving. However, it is discontinued and has limited practicality as a sedan. In contrast, the Ford Everest is a body-on-frame SUV priced at ₱2,288,000 (₱342,000 cheaper), with a more powerful 200 PS, 470 Nm engine, 4WD capability, and seating for 7 (2+3+2). It is currently available, has a longer warranty (3 years/100,000 km), and is better suited for families, off-road adventures, and hauling cargo. The Everest's fuel economy is not provided, but its larger engine and weight likely consume more fuel. Choose the Audi A3 if you prioritize luxury, fuel efficiency, and driving dynamics for city use. Choose the Ford Everest if you need a rugged, practical SUV for family trips and off-road driving at a lower price.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Everest is cheaper at ₱2,288,000, while the Audi A3 costs ₱2,630,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Everest has more power with 200 PS and 470 Nm, compared to the Audi A3's 150 PS and 320 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Audi A3 is better for daily commuting due to its smaller size, better fuel economy (5.2 km/L city), and quicker acceleration (0-100 km/h in 8.4 seconds).
Which has more seating capacity?
The Ford Everest seats 7 passengers (2+3+2), while the Audi A3 is a sedan with 5 seats.