Audi A7 3.0 V6 AT (2015) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Audi A7 3.0 V6 AT (2015) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Audi A7 3.0 V6 AT (2015) Audi ₱6,630,000 | Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) Ford ₱4,258,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | — |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | V6 |
| Displacement | 2995cc | 3496cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-valve | DOHC 24-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Twin-turbo, Intercooled |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 310 PS @ 5250-6500 rpm | 375 PS @ 5000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 440 Nm @ 2900-4500 rpm | 640 Nm @ 3500 rpm |
| Transmission | 7-Speed AT | 10-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | 4WD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10.5:1 |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 5.6 secs | — |
| Top Speed | 250 km/h | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | 26.2 (10.8) | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | 42.8 (6.6) | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 34.4 (8.2) | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Segment | E | J |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4969 | 5636 |
| Width (mm) | 1911 | 2029 |
| Height (mm) | 1420 | 1938 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2914 | 3343 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1785 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Trapezoidal Link, Programmable | Independent Suspension |
| Rear Suspension | Five-Link, Programmable | Independent Suspension |
| Front Wheels | 19x8.0" Alloys | — |
| Rear Wheels | 19x8.0" Alloys | — |
| Front Tires | 255/40 R19 | — |
| Rear Tires | 255/40 R19 | — |
| Front Brakes | Disc | — |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | — |
| Steering Column | Height adjust | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | — |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | — |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | — |
| Parking Brake | Manual | — |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | — |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | — |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Audi A7 3.0 V6 AT (2015) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer who values sporty performance, sleek sedan styling, and premium AWD dynamics, the 2015 Audi A7 3.0 V6 AT is the better fit despite its higher price of ₱6,630,000. It delivers 310 PS and 440 Nm, accelerates from 0‑100 km/h in 5.6 seconds, and offers a refined 7‑speed automatic with a lower curb weight, making it more engaging on city streets and highways. Its unlimited‑/2‑year warranty and discontinued status mean limited after‑sales support, but the sedan’s fuel‑economy figures (34.4 mpg combined) are superior to the Expedition’s, which is not listed. Conversely, the 2018 Ford Expedition Limited MAX, priced at ₱4,258,000, provides a massive 375 PS, 640 Nm, and a spacious 2+3+3 seating layout, ideal for large families or cargo needs. Its body‑on‑frame construction, 5‑door SUV form, and 4WD drivetrain suit rougher roads and off‑road trips, though fuel economy data is absent and its larger size may be less practical in congested Manila traffic. Choose the Audi if you prioritize performance, luxury sedan comfort, and fuel efficiency; choose the Ford if you need maximum interior space, higher torque for towing, and a lower purchase price for a family‑oriented SUV.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Ford Expedition Limited MAX AT costs ₱4,258,000, which is about ₱2,372,000 less than the Audi A7’s ₱6,630,000 price.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Ford Expedition produces 375 PS, surpassing the Audi A7’s 310 PS, while also delivering higher torque at 640 Nm versus 440 Nm.
Is the Audi more fuel‑efficient?
Yes. The Audi A7’s combined fuel economy is 34.4 mpg (8.2 L/100 km), whereas no fuel‑economy figures are provided for the Expedition.
Which car is more practical for a large family?
The Expedition, with its 2+3+3 seating capacity, five doors, and SUV body‑on‑frame build, is better suited for transporting up to eight passengers and cargo compared to the five‑seat sedan layout of the Audi.