Audi Q5 2.0 TDI Quattro S-tronic DCT (2015) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Audi Q5 2.0 TDI Quattro S-tronic DCT (2015) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Audi Q5 2.0 TDI Quattro S-tronic DCT (2015) Audi ₱4,580,000 | Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) Ford ₱4,258,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | — |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | V6 |
| Displacement | 1984cc | 3496cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 24-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler CRDI | Twin-turbo, Intercooled |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 177 PS @ 4200 rpm | 375 PS @ 5000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm | 640 Nm @ 3500 rpm |
| Transmission | 7-Speed DCT | 10-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | 4WD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10.5:1 |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 7.2 seconds | — |
| Top Speed | 220 km/h | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 11.8 km/l | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4629 | 5636 |
| Width (mm) | 1898 | 2029 |
| Height (mm) | 1655 | 1938 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2807 | 3343 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1755 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | 5-Link | Independent Suspension |
| Rear Suspension | Trapezoidal Link | Independent Suspension |
| Front Wheels | 20x8.0" Alloys | — |
| Rear Wheels | 20x8.0" Alloys | — |
| Front Tires | 225/45 R20 | — |
| Rear Tires | 225/45 R20 | — |
| Front Brakes | Disc | — |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | — |
| Steering Column | Height adjust | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | — |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | — |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | — |
| Parking Brake | Manual | — |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | — |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | — |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Audi Q5 2.0 TDI Quattro S-tronic DCT (2015) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018): which should you buy?
Both the 2015 Audi Q5 2.0 TDI Quattro and the 2018 Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost Limited MAX are large J‑segment SUVs, but they serve different buyer priorities. The Audi costs slightly more (₱4,580,000 vs ₱4,258,000) and comes with an unlimited‑mileage two‑year warranty, while the Expedition offers a longer three‑year/100,000 km warranty. Power is a decisive factor: the Expedition’s 375 PS and 640 Nm dwarf the Q5’s 177 PS and 380 Nm, giving it far stronger acceleration and towing capability, though the Q5’s 0‑100 km/h time of 7.2 seconds is respectable for its size. Fuel economy favors the diesel Q5 at 11.8 km/l, whereas the gasoline‑powered Expedition will consume more. Practicality leans toward the Expedition with a body‑on‑frame build, 5‑door layout, three‑row seating (2+3+3) and a massive 5.6 m length, making it ideal for large families or cargo. The Audi, with its unibody construction, AWD, and more refined diesel engine, suits buyers seeking a premium feel, better fuel efficiency, and a smaller footprint for city driving. In short, choose the Expedition if you need raw power, maximum passenger capacity, and a robust warranty; choose the Audi if you prefer a premium, fuel‑efficient SUV with a slightly higher resale appeal and a shorter warranty that still offers unlimited mileage for two years.
Frequently asked questions
Which SUV is cheaper?
The Ford Expedition 2018 is priced at ₱4,258,000, which is ₱322,000 less than the Audi Q5’s ₱4,580,000 price.
Which model has more power?
The Expedition delivers 375 PS and 640 Nm of torque, far exceeding the Q5’s 177 PS and 380 Nm.
Which vehicle is more fuel‑efficient?
The Audi Q5’s diesel engine achieves a combined 11.8 km/l, while the gasoline Expedition’s fuel economy is not listed but is expected to be lower.
Which SUV is better for large families or cargo?
The Expedition offers three rows of seats (2+3+3) and a longer 5.6 m body‑on‑frame design, making it more suitable for bigger families or heavy cargo than the two‑row Audi Q5.