Audi Q5 2.0 TFSI AT (2015) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Audi Q5 2.0 TFSI AT (2015) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Audi Q5 2.0 TFSI AT (2015) Audi ₱4,080,000 | Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) Ford ₱3,499,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 1984cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler Direct Injection | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 225 PS @ 4500-6250 rpm | 394 PS |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 2500 rpm | 676 Nm |
| Transmission | 8-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 7.4 secs | — |
| Top Speed | 222 km/h | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | 29.4 (9.6) | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | 40.9 (6.9) | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 35.8 (7.9) | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | SUV |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4629 | 4713 |
| Width (mm) | 1898 | 1881 |
| Height (mm) | 1655 | 1627 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2807 | 2984 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1755 | 2084 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Shadow Black, Star White, Velocity Blue Metallic, Glacier Gray, Grabber Yellow |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | 5-Link | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Trapezoidal Link | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 20x8.0" Alloys | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 20x8.0" Alloys | 19 |
| Front Tires | 225/45 R20 | 225/55R19 |
| Rear Tires | 225/45 R20 | 225/55R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | Height adjust | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 9 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Audi Q5 2.0 TFSI AT (2015) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) is the smarter choice over the Audi Q5 2.0 TFSI AT (2015). At ₱3,499,000, it is ₱581,000 cheaper than the Audi Q5 (₱4,080,000), despite being a newer model (2026 vs 2015). The Mach-E also delivers significantly more power (394 PS vs 225 PS) and torque (676 Nm vs 380 Nm), providing quicker acceleration and a more engaging drive. Being an electric vehicle, it offers lower fuel and maintenance costs, though it requires access to charging infrastructure. The Audi Q5, while a premium SUV with a conventional gas engine, is discontinued and carries higher upfront cost and running expenses. However, for buyers who prefer an established luxury brand and easy refueling, the Audi remains a solid used option. Practicality-wise, the Mach-E has a modern crossover body with 5 seats and ample cargo space, while the Q5 is a compact SUV. Overall, the Ford offers better value, performance, and efficiency for most Filipino buyers, especially those with home charging capability.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) is cheaper at ₱3,499,000, compared to the Audi Q5 2.0 TFSI AT (2015) at ₱4,080,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is more powerful with 394 PS and 676 Nm, while the Audi Q5 produces 225 PS and 380 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is better for daily commuting due to its electric powertrain, which offers lower running costs, but it relies on charging access. The Audi Q5 runs on gas and has no range anxiety, but higher fuel expenses.
Which is more practical for a family?
Both have 5 seats, but the Ford Mustang Mach-E (2026) is a midsize crossover with modern features, while the Audi Q5 (2015) is an older compact SUV. The Mach-E likely has better tech and space, but practicality depends on charging availability.