Audi RS 5 3.2 FSI Quattro S-tronic V8 DCT (2015) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Audi RS 5 3.2 FSI Quattro S-tronic V8 DCT (2015) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Audi RS 5 3.2 FSI Quattro S-tronic V8 DCT (2015) Audi ₱5,700,000 | Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) Ford ₱4,258,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | — |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V8 | V6 |
| Displacement | 4163cc | 3496cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 32-valve | DOHC 24-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Twin-turbo, Intercooled |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 450 PS @ 8250 rpm | 375 PS @ 5000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 430 Nm @ 4000-6000 rpm | 640 Nm @ 3500 rpm |
| Transmission | 7-Speed DCT | 10-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | 4WD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10.5:1 |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 4.5 seconds | — |
| Top Speed | 280 km/h | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | 6.9 km/l | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | 12.0 km/l | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 9.6 km/l | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Segment | D | J |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 2+3+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4649 | 5636 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 2029 |
| Height (mm) | 1366 | 1938 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2751 | 3343 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1715 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | 5-Link | Independent Suspension |
| Rear Suspension | Trapezoidal Link | Independent Suspension |
| Front Wheels | 19x9.0 | — |
| Rear Wheels | 19x9.0 | — |
| Front Tires | 265/35 R19 | — |
| Rear Tires | 265/35 R19 | — |
| Front Brakes | Disc | — |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | — |
| Steering Column | Height adjust | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | — |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | — |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | — |
| Parking Brake | Manual | — |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | — |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | — |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Audi RS 5 3.2 FSI Quattro S-tronic V8 DCT (2015) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018): which should you buy?
The Audi RS 5 3.2 FSI Quattro S-tronic V8 DCT (2015) is better for Filipino buyers seeking a high-performance coupe with AWD and a powerful V8 engine. Its 450 PS and 430 Nm of torque deliver strong acceleration (0–100 km/h in 4.5 seconds) and a top speed of 280 km/h, making it suitable for spirited driving. The RS 5’s AWD and 7-speed DCT transmission enhance handling on Philippine roads. The Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) is ideal for families or those needing utility, offering a spacious interior (2+3+3 seats) and 4WD for varied terrain, but at a lower power output of 375 PS and 640 Nm. Price is the key differentiator: the RS 5 costs ₱5,700,000 vs. ₱4,258,000, and the Expedition’s warranty (3-years/100,000km) differs from the RS 5’s unlimited/2-years coverage. Choose the RS 5 if budget allows and you prioritize performance; opt for the Expedition if practicality and space are more critical.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) costs ₱4,258,000, while the Audi RS 5 3.2 FSI Quattro S-tronic V8 DCT (2015) costs ₱5,700,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Audi RS 5 3.2 FSI Quattro S-tronic V8 DCT (2015) produces 450 PS, while the Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) produces 375 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) has a larger interior (2+3+3 seats) and is built for utility, making it more practical for daily commutes.
What is the warranty coverage?
The Audi RS 5 3.2 FSI Quattro S-tronic V8 DCT (2015) has unlimited/2-years warranty, while the Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) has 3-years/100,000km warranty.