Audi S3 2.0 TFSI quattro (2015) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Audi S3 2.0 TFSI quattro (2015) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Audi S3 2.0 TFSI quattro (2015) Audi ₱4,500,000 | Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018) Ford ₱4,258,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | — |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | V6 |
| Displacement | 1984cc | 3496cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 24-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Twin-turbo, Intercooled |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 290 PS @ 3500-6200 rpm | 375 PS @ 5000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1800-5500 rpm | 640 Nm @ 3500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed DCT | 10-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | 4WD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | 5.2 seconds | — |
| Top Speed | 249 km/h | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Segment | C | J |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 2+3+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4466 | 5636 |
| Width (mm) | 1796 | 2029 |
| Height (mm) | 1392 | 1938 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2631 | 3343 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1470 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 55 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | McPherson struts with lower wishbones, aluminum subframe, tubular anti-roll bar | Independent Suspension |
| Rear Suspension | Four-link rear suspension with separate spring/shock absorber arrangement, subframe, tubular anti-roll bar | Independent Suspension |
| Front Wheels | 19" alloy | — |
| Rear Wheels | 19" alloy | — |
| Front Tires | 235/35 R19 | — |
| Rear Tires | 235/35 R19 | — |
| Front Brakes | Disc | — |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | — |
| Steering Type | EPS | — |
| Steering Column | Electromechanical | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | Yes | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central | — |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-Zone Auto Climate Control | — |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | — |
| Parking Brake | Electric | — |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | — |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 12 | — |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Bi-Xenon | — |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Audi S3 2.0 TFSI quattro (2015) vs Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (2018): which should you buy?
The Audi S3 2.0 TFSI quattro (2015) is the better choice for most Filipino buyers valuing performance and driving dynamics. At ₱4,500,000, it costs ₱242,000 more than the Ford Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD Limited MAX AT (₱4,258,000) but delivers significantly higher power (290 PS vs 375 PS) and torque (380 Nm vs 640 Nm). The Audi's AWD system and 6-speed DCT transmission offer superior traction and responsiveness, while the Ford's 10-speed automatic and 4WD system prioritize off-road capability and stability. For daily commuting, the Audi's sedan form factor and 0–60 mph time of 5.2 seconds provide a smoother urban drive, whereas the SUV's higher seating capacity and longer wheelbase (5636 mm) suit larger families. The unlimited/2-year warranty and current availability add confidence, making the Audi the optimal pick for performance-focused owners. The Ford, however, is suited for those prioritizing ruggedness and towing capacity.