BAIC M20 Basic (2015) vs Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Standard MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of BAIC M20 Basic (2015) vs Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Standard MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | BAIC M20 Basic (2015) Baic ₱578,000 | Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Standard MT (2015) Suzuki ₱445,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-3 |
| Displacement | 1499 | 796cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | SOHC 12-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 115.5 PS | 48 PS @ 6200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 150 Nm | 68 Nm @ 3500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | Hatchback |
| Segment | Utility | A |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4440 | 3395 |
| Width (mm) | 1700 | 1490 |
| Height (mm) | 1783 | 1475 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2790 | 2360 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1270 | 725 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 50 | 35 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Multi-link Rigid Axle |
| Front Wheels | 14 Steel Rim | 13 |
| Rear Wheels | 14 Steel Rim | 13 |
| Front Tires | 185/65 R14 | 145/70 R13 |
| Rear Tires | 185/65 R14 | 145/70 R13 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Electric | — |
| Steering Column | Collapsible | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4-Speakers | 2 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Projector Type | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
BAIC M20 Basic (2015) vs Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Standard MT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, space and performance, the Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Standard MT is the more sensible choice if budget and city driving are top priorities. Priced at ₱445,000, it is ₱133,000 cheaper than the discontinued BAIC M20, which costs ₱578,000 and is no longer in production, making parts and service harder to secure. The Alto’s 796 cc three‑cylinder engine delivers 48 PS and 68 Nm, sufficient for daily commuting and fuel‑efficient city trips, while the BAIC’s larger 1.5 L four‑cylinder produces 115.5 PS and 150 Nm, offering noticeably more power but at the cost of higher price and likely higher fuel consumption. In practicality, the BAIC seats up to eight (2+3+3) in a body‑on‑frame MPV layout, appealing to larger families or those needing extra passenger capacity, whereas the Alto accommodates five in a compact hatchback, ideal for tight Manila streets and parking. Both carry the same 100,000 km/3‑year warranty, but the Alto’s current availability ensures dealer support, whereas the BAIC is discontinued. Choose the Alto for affordability, ease of maintenance and urban maneuverability; opt for the BAIC only if you need the extra seating capacity and can manage the higher purchase price and potential parts scarcity.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Standard MT costs ₱445,000, which is ₱133,000 less than the BAIC M20’s price of ₱578,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The BAIC M20 produces 115.5 PS and 150 Nm, significantly more than the Alto’s 48 PS and 68 Nm.
Is the BAIC M20 still available?
No, the BAIC M20 is listed as discontinued, while the Suzuki Alto is currently available.
Which car offers more passenger space?
The BAIC M20 seats up to eight (2+3+3) in a 5‑door MPV body, whereas the Alto seats five (2+3) in a hatchback.