BYD F3 1.5-MT (Taxi Model) (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of BYD F3 1.5-MT (Taxi Model) (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | BYD F3 1.5-MT (Taxi Model) (2015) BYD ₱698,000 | Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) Suzuki ₱763,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3yrs | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1488cc | 1590cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 107 PS @ 5800 rpm | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm |
| Max Torque | 145 Nm @ 4800 rpm | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | MPV AUV |
| Segment | C | MPV |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 3+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4533 | 4155 |
| Width (mm) | 1705 | 1655 |
| Height (mm) | 1490 | 1865 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2600 | 2625 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1200 | 1270 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 50 | 46 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Burgundy Red Pearl, Superior White, Silky Silver |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut Independent | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam w/ Trailing Arm | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs |
| Front Wheels | 15 Alloy | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 15 Alloy | 14 |
| Front Tires | 195/60 R15 | 185/60 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 195/ 60 R15 | 185/60 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | — |
| Steering Column | Tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | No |
| Door Locking | Standard | Standard |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Rotary Type | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Key Type | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2-Speakers | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
BYD F3 1.5-MT (Taxi Model) (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for the most economical and practical choice, the BYD F3 1.5‑MT (Taxi Model) is the better option. It comes in at ₱698,000, which is ₱65,000 cheaper than the Suzuki APV Type II GA MT. The BYD’s 1.5‑L inline‑4 engine delivers 107 PS at 5800 rpm and 145 Nm torque at 4800 rpm, noticeably higher than the Suzuki’s 91 PS and 127 Nm. Both vehicles share a 5‑speed manual transmission, but the BYD is front‑wheel drive while the Suzuki is rear‑wheel drive. In terms of practicality, the BYD sedan seats 5 (2+3) in a compact 4533 mm length, making it easier to maneuver and park in congested city streets. The Suzuki, on the other hand, is a 7‑seat MPV with body‑on‑frame construction and five doors, offering more passenger space but at a higher price and slightly lower power. If you need a small, fuel‑efficient car for daily commuting or short taxi routes, the BYD is superior. If you require a larger family vehicle with more seating and cargo room, the Suzuki APV is the better fit. Both come with a 100,000 km/3‑year warranty and are currently available.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The BYD F3 1.5‑MT costs ₱698,000, while the Suzuki APV Type II GA MT is priced at ₱763,000.
Which has more power?
The BYD’s 1.5‑L engine produces 107 PS and 145 Nm, compared to the Suzuki’s 91 PS and 127 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The BYD’s lower price, higher power, and compact sedan size make it more suitable for daily city driving.
Which offers more seating capacity?
The Suzuki APV seats 8 (3+3+2) across five doors, while the BYD sedan seats 5 (2+3).