BYD Qin Plug-in Hybrid (2015) vs Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of BYD Qin Plug-in Hybrid (2015) vs Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | BYD Qin Plug-in Hybrid (2015) BYD ₱2,488,000 | Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱2,288,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 + Electric Motor | Inline-5 |
| Displacement | 1497cc | 3198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 20-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged, Direct Injection | Turbocharged CRDI |
| Fuel Type | Gas/Electr | Diesel |
| Max Power | 152 PS (Engine) / 149 (Motor) | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 240 Nm @ 1750 - 3500 rpm ( Engine) / 250 Nm (Motor) | 470 Nm @ 1750 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed Dual Cluch A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Segment | C | J |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4740 | 4893 |
| Width (mm) | 1770 | 1862 |
| Height (mm) | 1480 | 1836 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2670 | 2850 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1720 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Double Wishbone |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Live Axle |
| Front Wheels | 17-inch alloys | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 17-inch alloys | 20 |
| Front Tires | 205/50/R17 | 265/50 R20 |
| Rear Tires | 205/50/R17 | 265/50 R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Speakers | — | 10 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen + Foglamps | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
BYD Qin Plug-in Hybrid (2015) vs Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers, the choice between the 2015 BYD Qin Plug-in Hybrid and the 2017 Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium hinges on lifestyle and budget. The Everest is cheaper at ₱2,288,000 versus ₱2,488,000 for the Qin, yet offers significantly more torque (470 Nm vs 250 Nm from the motor) and a robust diesel engine ideal for off-road or towing. Its body-on-frame construction, 4WD, and 7 seats make it suitable for large families and rough terrain. In contrast, the Qin is a plug-in hybrid sedan with a combined system producing around 300 PS (engine+ motor), but it's front-wheel-drive and less practical for cargo or adventure. It may offer better fuel economy in city driving with electric assist, but lacks the Everest's space and durability. For daily commuting in metro Manila, the Qin's hybrid tech could save on fuel, but the Everest's higher power and versatility make it a better value for those needing off-road capability or hauling. Ultimately, the Everest is the pragmatic choice for most Filipino buyers unless priorities are strictly fuel efficiency and urban use.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4x4 AT (2017) is cheaper at ₱2,288,000 compared to the BYD Qin Plug-in Hybrid (2015) at ₱2,488,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Everest produces 200 PS and 470 Nm of torque from its diesel engine, while the Qin has a gasoline engine with 152 PS and 240 Nm plus an electric motor with 149 PS and 250 Nm, but combined output is not specified. The Everest has higher peak torque and likely stronger overall performance for heavy-duty use.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The BYD Qin, as a plug-in hybrid sedan, may offer better fuel efficiency in stop-and-go traffic due to its electric motor, but its higher price and smaller size (5 seats) make it less practical for larger families. The Everest is larger, more expensive to fuel, but more versatile for varied driving conditions.
Which vehicle has more seating capacity?
The Ford Everest seats 7 people (2+3+2 configuration), while the BYD Qin seats only 5 (2+3), making the Everest better for larger groups or families.