BYD Qin Plug-in Hybrid (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of BYD Qin Plug-in Hybrid (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | BYD Qin Plug-in Hybrid (2015) BYD ₱2,488,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱2,145,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 + Electric Motor | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1497cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged, Direct Injection | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Gas/Electr | Diesel |
| Max Power | 152 PS (Engine) / 149 (Motor) | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 240 Nm @ 1750 - 3500 rpm ( Engine) / 250 Nm (Motor) | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed Dual Cluch A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Segment | C | J |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4740 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1770 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1480 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2670 | 2845 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1720 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 17-inch alloys | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 17-inch alloys | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 205/50/R17 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 205/50/R17 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Power Asisted |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Climate Control | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen + Foglamps | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | Yes |
BYD Qin Plug-in Hybrid (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For most Filipino buyers, the Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 is the more practical and cost-effective choice. It is significantly cheaper at ₱2,145,000 versus the BYD Qin's ₱2,488,000, saving you ₱343,000. The mu-X offers a powerful 3.0L diesel engine with 177 PS and 380 Nm torque, plus 4WD capability—ideal for Philippine roads and off-road conditions. It seats 7 passengers, making it perfect for families, while the BYD Qin is a 5-seater sedan. The BYD is a plug-in hybrid with a combined gasoline and electric powertrain, but its 2015 model lacks modern features and has a lower torque output. Unless you specifically want a green vehicle and have access to charging, the Isuzu delivers better value, durability, and versatility for daily use and adventures.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu-X is cheaper at ₱2,145,000, while the BYD Qin costs ₱2,488,000—a difference of ₱343,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Isuzu mu-X produces 177 PS and 380 Nm of torque, whereas the BYD Qin’s engine delivers 152 PS and 240 Nm, plus an electric motor with 149 PS and 250 Nm. In terms of outright torque, the diesel Isuzu has the edge.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The BYD Qin as a plug-in hybrid could be more fuel-efficient in city driving if charged, but its electric range is unspecified. The Isuzu mu-X is a diesel SUV that offers strong low-end torque for traffic, but fuel costs may be higher.
Which has more seats and space?
The Isuzu mu-X seats up to 7 passengers (2+3+2) and is longer (4,825 mm) and wider, making it better for families. The BYD Qin seats only 5 and is a sedan with less interior room.