Chevrolet Camaro RS 3.6L Coupe V6 AT (2015) vs Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Camaro RS 3.6L Coupe V6 AT (2015) vs Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Camaro RS 3.6L Coupe V6 AT (2015) Chevrolet ₱3,218,888 | Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) Toyota ₱3,379,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | V6 |
| Displacement | 3564cc | 3456cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-Valve | DOHC 24-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Direct Injection | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-I |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 316 PS @ 6400 rpm | 275 PS @ 6200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 377 Nm @ 5200 rpm | 340 Nm @ 4700 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 4-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Van |
| Segment | S | M |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4840 | 4850 |
| Width (mm) | 1920 | 1830 |
| Height (mm) | 1380 | 1905 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2950 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 20x7.5" Alloys | 16x7.0 |
| Rear Wheels | 20x7.5" Alloys | 16x7.0 |
| Front Tires | 245/45/R20 | 215/45 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 245/45/R20 | 215/45 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | — |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Comfort Access Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 8 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | HID |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
Chevrolet Camaro RS 3.6L Coupe V6 AT (2015) vs Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer deciding between the Chevrolet Camaro RS 3.6L V6 and the Toyota Alphard 3.5L V6, the choice hinges entirely on lifestyle and needs. The Camaro is a pure sports coupe: it produces 316 PS and 377 Nm, outmuscling the Alphard’s 275 PS and 340 Nm. It’s also cheaper at ₱3,218,888 versus ₱3,379,000, and has a 6-speed automatic transmission compared to the Alphard’s dated 4-speed. However, the Camaro seats only 2+2 in a cramped coupe body, has a 2-door layout, and offers minimal cargo space, making it impractical for daily family use or hauling. The Alphard, despite being ₱161k more expensive, is a spacious 3-row van (2+2+3 seating) with 5 doors, better suited for families, VIP transport, or daily commuting. Its FWD drivetrain is more predictable in traffic, and the 4-speed AT, though older, is durable. If you want thrills, style, and raw power, get the Camaro. If you need practicality, passenger space, and versatility, the Alphard is the logical choice. Both are discontinued, so factor in parts availability.
Frequently asked questions
Which car is cheaper?
The Chevrolet Camaro is cheaper at ₱3,218,888, while the Toyota Alphard costs ₱3,379,000 — a difference of about ₱161,000.
Which car has more power?
The Camaro is more powerful with 316 PS and 377 Nm, versus the Alphard's 275 PS and 340 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting in traffic?
The Alphard is better for daily commuting due to its spacious cabin, 5 doors, and more practical FWD layout; the Camaro's coupe body and RWD are less comfortable in heavy traffic.
Which car is better for families?
The Toyota Alphard is the clear family choice with 3-row seating (2+2+3), more doors, and much more interior space. The Camaro only seats 2+2 in a snug coupe.