Chevrolet Colorado 2.8L 4×2 AT LT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Colorado 2.8L 4×2 AT LT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Colorado 2.8L 4×2 AT LT (2015) Chevrolet ₱1,218,888 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/5-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2776cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Variable Turbocharger (VGS) |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 203 PS @ 3800 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 500 Nm @ 2000 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) |
| Drivetrain | RWD | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Van |
| Segment | Pickup | M |
| Construction | Body-On-Frame | — |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 3 |
| Length (mm) | 5347 | 5080 |
| Width (mm) | 1882 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1790 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3096 | 2940 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1825 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Short Long Arms with Coil Spring | Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Beam Axle with Leaf Spring | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16'' Alloys | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 16'' Alloys | 15 |
| Front Tires | 245/70 R16 | 195/80R15LT |
| Rear Tires | 245/70 R16 | 195/80R15LT |
| Front Brakes | Disc | — |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Power Steering |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | Manual Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Front Curtain Airbags | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Manual, Dial Type |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Manual |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Chevrolet Colorado 2.8L 4×2 AT LT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing a work‑horse pickup against a cargo van, the choice hinges on power, payload layout and price. The 2015 Chevrolet Colorado 2.8L 4×2 AT LT costs ₱1,218,888, about ₱60,888 more than the Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo at ₱1,158,000. The Colorado delivers a far stronger drivetrain – 203 PS and 500 Nm of torque – versus the Urvan’s 129 PS and 356 Nm, giving the pickup superior towing and hill‑climbing ability, especially useful for hauling heavy equipment or trailers. The Colorado’s 6‑speed automatic and rear‑wheel‑drive platform also suit rugged road conditions, while the Urvan’s 5‑speed manual is simpler but less refined for heavy loads. In terms of practicality, the Colorado seats 2 + 3 with a 4‑door cabin and a body‑on‑frame chassis, ideal for a small crew plus cargo bed. The Urvan, a 4‑door van with a single driver seat and three‑person capacity, offers a fully enclosed cargo volume (5080 mm L × 1695 mm W × 2285 mm H) better for protecting goods from weather. Both are discontinued models with similar warranties (5 years/100 k km for Colorado, 3 years/100 k km for Urvan). Choose the Colorado if you need higher power, towing capacity and a versatile crew‑plus‑bed setup and can afford the higher price. Opt for the Urvan if you prioritize a lower purchase price, enclosed cargo space and are comfortable with a manual transmission for city‑based deliveries.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is cheaper at ₱1,158,000 compared to the Chevrolet Colorado’s ₱1,218,888.
Which model offers more power?
The Chevrolet Colorado provides more power with 203 PS and 500 Nm of torque, while the Urvan has 129 PS and 356 Nm.
Is the Colorado’s transmission automatic?
Yes, the Colorado comes with a 6‑speed automatic transmission; the Urvan uses a 5‑speed manual.
Which vehicle is better for protecting cargo from the elements?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo, being a fully enclosed van (5080 mm L × 1695 mm W × 2285 mm H), offers better protection for goods than the open‑bed pickup design of the Colorado.