Chevrolet Colorado 2.8L 4×2 AT LT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Colorado 2.8L 4×2 AT LT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Colorado 2.8L 4×2 AT LT (2015) Chevrolet ₱1,218,888 | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/5-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2776cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 203 PS @ 3800 rpm | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 500 Nm @ 2000 rpm | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Pick Up |
| Segment | Pickup | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Body-On-Frame | Body On Frame |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5347 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1882 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1790 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3096 | 3220 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Short Long Arms with Coil Spring | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Beam Axle with Leaf Spring | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16'' Alloys | 17" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 16'' Alloys | 17" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 245/70 R16 | 265/65 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 245/70 R16 | 265/65 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Front Curtain Airbags | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Single Zone Automatic |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Chevrolet Colorado 2.8L 4×2 AT LT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
If you prioritize raw power, torque, and driving ease, the Chevrolet Colorado 2.8L is the clear winner. Its 203 PS and 500 Nm of torque significantly outperform the Ranger's 160 PS and 385 Nm, making it better for heavy hauling or towing. The 6-speed automatic transmission is also more convenient for daily driving and city traffic compared to the Ranger's manual. Both are discontinued, but the Colorado offers a longer 5-year warranty versus the Ranger's 3-year, though the Ranger is two years newer (2017 vs. 2015). Prices are nearly identical (₱1,218,888 vs. ₱1,219,000), so the Colorado gives more value for money if you want power and auto. However, buyers who prefer a manual transmission or a newer model year might lean toward the Ranger. For a typical Filipino buyer needing a workhorse with effortless torque and automatic convenience, the Colorado is the better pick.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper: the 2015 Chevrolet Colorado or the 2017 Ford Ranger?
They are almost the same price: the Colorado is ₱1,218,888 and the Ranger is ₱1,219,000 — a difference of just ₱112.
Which has more power: the Colorado or the Ranger?
The Chevrolet Colorado has significantly more power: 203 PS versus the Ranger's 160 PS. It also has much higher torque: 500 Nm vs. 385 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Colorado is better for commuting because it has a 6-speed automatic transmission, which is easier in traffic than the Ranger's 6-speed manual.
Which has a longer warranty?
The Colorado comes with a 5-year/100,000 km warranty, while the Ranger has a 3-year/100,000 km warranty.