Chevrolet Colorado 2.8L 4×4 LTZ AT Dsl (2015) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Trend (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Colorado 2.8L 4×4 LTZ AT Dsl (2015) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Trend (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Colorado 2.8L 4×4 LTZ AT Dsl (2015) Chevrolet ₱1,538,888 | Ford Territory Hybrid Trend (2026) Ford ₱1,399,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2776cc | 1498cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | 16-valve |
| Aspiration | VGT Intercooler CRDI | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Hybrid |
| Max Power | 180 PS @ 3800 rpm | 150 PS |
| Max Torque | 440 Nm @ 2000 rpm | 230 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T, LSD | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | 4x4 | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Pickup | Crossover |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5347 | 4685 |
| Width (mm) | 1870 | 1935 |
| Height (mm) | 1785 | 1706 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3095 | 2726 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2019 | 1611 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Blue Panther, Crystal Pearl White, Oasis Green, Panther Black, Star White |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 60 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Axle | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.0" Alloys | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.0" Alloys | 18 |
| Front Tires | 255/65/R17 | 235/55R18 |
| Rear Tires | 255/65/R17 | 235/55R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | Yes |
Chevrolet Colorado 2.8L 4×4 LTZ AT Dsl (2015) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Trend (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, power, and practicality between the 2015 Chevrolet Colorado 2.8L 4×4 LTZ AT Dsl and the 2026 Ford Territory Hybrid Trend, the decision hinges on intended use. The Colorado is a body‑on‑frame pickup with a robust 180 PS diesel engine, 440 Nm torque at low rpm, and a 6‑speed automatic with LSD, making it ideal for heavy-duty work, off‑road adventures, or hauling cargo. Its 4×4 drivetrain and higher power output give it a clear advantage for rugged tasks, but its older model year (2015) and higher price of ₱1,538,888 may be a drawback for those prioritizing modern amenities or fuel efficiency. The Territory Hybrid, priced lower at ₱1,399,000, offers a 150 PS hybrid powertrain with 230 Nm torque and a front‑wheel drive layout, suitable for urban commuting and family use. Its unibody construction, five doors, and available color options cater to comfort and style rather than towing capacity. If you need a vehicle for heavy-duty work or off‑road use, the Colorado is the better choice despite its higher cost and older technology. If your priority is daily commuting, lower fuel consumption, and a more contemporary design, the Territory Hybrid provides a more economical and user‑friendly option. Ultimately, choose based on whether your primary need is power and ruggedness (Colorado) or efficiency and everyday practicality (Territory).
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Territory Hybrid Trend is cheaper at ₱1,399,000 compared to the Chevrolet Colorado 2.8L 4×4 LTZ AT Dsl priced at ₱1,538,888.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Chevrolet Colorado delivers 180 PS, while the Ford Territory Hybrid offers 150 PS; thus the Colorado has higher power output.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
The Ford Territory Hybrid, with its hybrid powertrain and front‑wheel drive, is more suited for daily commuting due to better fuel efficiency and a modern unibody design.
Which vehicle is more suitable for heavy‑duty work?
The Chevrolet Colorado, with its diesel engine, 4×4 drivetrain, and higher torque of 440 Nm, is better suited for heavy‑duty work and off‑road use.