Chevrolet Malibu 2.4 LTZ AT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Malibu 2.4 LTZ AT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Malibu 2.4 LTZ AT (2015) Chevrolet ₱1,528,888 |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
Nissan
₱1,570,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2384cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated Direct Injection | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 167 PS @ 5800 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 225 Nm @ 4600 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Van |
| Segment | D | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4865 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 1855 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1465 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2737 | 2555 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2076 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18" Alloys | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 18" Alloys | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | F: 245/45/R18 / R: 2 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | F: 245/45/R18 / R: 2 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
Chevrolet Malibu 2.4 LTZ AT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?
The Chevrolet Malibu 2.4 LTZ AT and the Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T cater to very different needs, so the choice hinges on what you value most. If you want a comfortable, fuel‑efficient sedan for daily commuting or family trips, the Malibu is the clear pick. It’s priced slightly lower at ₱1,528,888 and offers a 167 PS inline‑4 engine with 225 Nm torque, all in a front‑wheel‑drive layout that’s easier to handle on Philippine roads. The 6‑speed automatic transmission adds convenience, and its sedan body with four doors and a 4‑seat layout makes it practical for small families or solo travelers. On the other hand, if you need a versatile work vehicle that can haul cargo or passengers in a van configuration, the Nissan NV350 Urvan is designed for that purpose. Though it’s priced a bit higher at ₱1,570,000 and has a 5‑speed manual transmission, it offers a larger 2488cc turbocharged diesel engine that delivers 356 Nm of torque, ideal for heavy loads. Its rear‑wheel drive and body‑on‑frame construction give it durability for commercial use, while the three‑door layout can be advantageous in tight spaces. In short, choose the Malibu for everyday comfort and efficiency; choose the Urvan if you need a rugged van for transport or business purposes.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Chevrolet Malibu 2.4 LTZ AT costs ₱1,528,888, which is slightly cheaper than the Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T priced at ₱1,570,000.
Which has more power and torque?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan’s 2488cc turbocharged diesel engine produces 129 PS and 356 Nm of torque, while the Malibu’s 2384cc naturally aspirated engine delivers 167 PS and 225 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Malibu, with its front‑wheel drive, 6‑speed automatic transmission, and sedan body, is more suited for daily commuting and family use.
Which vehicle is better for commercial or cargo use?
The Urvan’s body‑on‑frame construction, rear‑wheel drive, and higher torque make it more appropriate for commercial or cargo transport.