Chevrolet Trailblazer 2.8L 4×4 LTZ AT Dsl (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Trailblazer 2.8L 4×4 LTZ AT Dsl (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Trailblazer 2.8L 4×4 LTZ AT Dsl (2015) Chevrolet ₱1,733,888 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Not available | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2776cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | VG Turbo Intercooler CRDI | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3800 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 500 Nm @ 2000 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T, LSD | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4878 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1902 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1847 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 2845 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2750 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | 5-Link | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 16x7.0" Alloys | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 16x7.0" Alloys | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 245/70/R16 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 245/70/R16 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Power Asisted |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | Yes |
Chevrolet Trailblazer 2.8L 4×4 LTZ AT Dsl (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For the Filipino buyer, the choice between these two SUVs hinges on availability and intended use. The 2015 Chevrolet Trailblazer 2.8L 4×4 LTZ is notably more powerful with 200 PS and 500 Nm torque, and its 4WD system and 7-seat capacity (2+3+2) make it ideal for off-road adventures and larger families. However, it is not currently available as new (only second-hand) and carries a slightly lower price of ₱1,733,888. In contrast, the 2018 Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 is currently available, costs ₱1,845,000, but is less powerful (177 PS, 380 Nm) and only 5-seater with rear-wheel drive. The Trailblazer's body-on-frame construction and limited-slip differential give it superior off-road capability, while the mu-X is better suited for daily commuting and on-road use due to its newer model year and availability. If you need off-road prowess and can find a well-maintained used unit, the Trailblazer offers more value. For a worry-free, modern daily driver with warranty, the mu-X is the practical pick.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper between the Chevrolet Trailblazer and Isuzu mu-X?
The Chevrolet Trailblazer is cheaper at ₱1,733,888 compared to the Isuzu mu-X at ₱1,845,000.
Which vehicle is more powerful?
The Chevrolet Trailblazer is more powerful with 200 PS and 500 Nm torque, versus the Isuzu mu-X's 177 PS and 380 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Isuzu mu-X is better for daily commuting as it is newer (2018), currently available, and rear-wheel drive suits paved roads, while the Trailblazer is older and not available new.
Which SUV is better for off-road driving?
The Chevrolet Trailblazer is better for off-road thanks to its 4WD drivetrain, body-on-frame construction, and limited-slip differential, whereas the mu-X is only rear-wheel drive.