Chevrolet Trax 1.4 LT AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Trax 1.4 LT AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Trax 1.4 LT AT (2015) Chevrolet ₱1,218,000 | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/5-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1364cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | DVCP, Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 140 PS @ 4900 6000 rpm | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 200 Nm @ 1850 4900 rpm | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | Pick Up |
| Segment | J | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Unibody | Body On Frame |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4245 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1775 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1670 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2555 | 3220 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/ Stabilizer | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18-inch alloys | 17" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 18-inch alloys | 17" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 215/55/R18 | 265/65 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 215/55/R18 | 265/65 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Single Zone Automatic |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric, Urethane | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Power Seats | — | Yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen + Foglamps | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
Chevrolet Trax 1.4 LT AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a compact, fuel‑efficient crossover with modern styling and a 5‑door layout, the Chevrolet Trax 1.4 LT AT is the better pick. Priced at ₱1,218,000—just one peso cheaper than the Ford Ranger—it offers a turbocharged 1.4‑liter engine that delivers 140 PS and 200 Nm of torque, sufficient for city driving and occasional light off‑road use. Its front‑wheel drive and unibody construction keep the vehicle lighter, improving fuel economy compared to the heavier Ranger. The Trax’s 5‑door design and 2+3 seating make it more practical for families or commuters needing easy access to the rear seats. The Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L, while more powerful with 160 PS and a hefty 385 Nm torque from its diesel engine, is a 4×2 pickup with body‑on‑frame construction and rear‑wheel drive, making it better suited for users who need a workhorse for hauling or towing. However, its higher power and larger size come at the cost of a longer wheelbase (5277 mm vs. 4245 mm) and heavier build, which can reduce fuel efficiency and maneuverability in tight urban settings. In summary, choose the Trax for everyday commuting, family use, and better fuel economy; opt for the Ranger if you require a rugged pickup with higher torque for heavy-duty tasks.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Chevrolet Trax 1.4 LT AT costs ₱1,218,000, while the Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L is priced at ₱1,219,000—just one peso more expensive.
Which has more power?
The Ford Ranger’s diesel engine produces 160 PS, slightly higher than the Trax’s turbocharged 140 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Trax’s front‑wheel drive, 5‑door layout, and smaller size make it more suitable for city driving and family commuting.
Which vehicle offers better towing capacity?
The data does not provide towing figures, so this cannot be determined from the given information.