Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend MT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend MT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend MT (2015) Ford ₱908,000 | Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) Suzuki ₱865,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 1373cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Ti-VCT | Fuel Injection |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 110 PS @ 6300 rpm | 96 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 142 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 4-Speed AT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | MPV |
| Segment | J | M |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4245 | 4265 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1708 | 1985 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2521 | 2740 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1185 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring, Anti-roll Bar | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Twist Beam w/ Twin Gas, Oil Filled Shock Absorber | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 15'' Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 15'' Alloys |
| Front Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/65 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/65 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt + tele |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Cloth | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend MT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers, the choice between the Ford EcoSport 1.5 Trend MT (2015) and the Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) hinges on your primary need: style and power versus practicality and passenger capacity. The EcoSport is a subcompact hatchback with a body-on-frame construction, offering a sportier look and more power (110 PS vs 96 PS) and torque (142 Nm vs 130 Nm). It has a 5-speed manual transmission and rear-wheel drive, which may appeal to driving enthusiasts. However, it seats only 5 and has a smaller cargo area typical of hatchbacks. In contrast, the Ertiga is a 7-seater MPV with a unibody construction, making it more practical for families or those who frequently carry more passengers. It has a 4-speed automatic transmission and front-wheel drive, which is easier for daily commuting in traffic. The Ertiga is also cheaper at ₱865,000 versus ₱908,000. Both have similar warranty coverage and are currently available. If you prioritize passenger capacity, fuel efficiency (smaller engine), and ease of driving, the Ertiga is the better choice. If you want more power, a manual transmission, and a rugged body-on-frame design, go for the EcoSport.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) is cheaper at ₱865,000 compared to the Ford EcoSport 1.5 Trend MT (2015) at ₱908,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford EcoSport has more power with 110 PS and 142 Nm torque, while the Suzuki Ertiga has 96 PS and 130 Nm torque.
Which is better for a family?
The Suzuki Ertiga is better for families as it seats 7 passengers (2+2+3) compared to the EcoSport's 5 seats, and it has an automatic transmission for easier driving.
Which has better fuel economy?
Based on engine displacement, the Suzuki Ertiga's smaller 1373cc engine likely offers better fuel economy than the EcoSport's 1498cc engine, but exact figures are not provided.