Ford Escape 2.0 EcoBoost Titanium AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Escape 2.0 EcoBoost Titanium AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Escape 2.0 EcoBoost Titanium AT (2015) Ford ₱1,790,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1999cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 178 PS @ 5700 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 249 Nm @ 2500 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 1524 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1838 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1702 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2690 | 2845 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1580 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 17" Alloys | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 17" Alloys | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 235/55 R17 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 235/55 R17 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Power Asisted |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Escape 2.0 EcoBoost Titanium AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the 2015 Ford Escape 2.0 EcoBoost Titanium AT (₱1,790,000) and the 2018 Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (₱1,845,000) depends on priorities. The Escape is cheaper by ₱55,000 and offers a powerful 178 PS gas turbo engine with 249 Nm torque, but it's discontinued and has a shorter 1,524 mm length, indicating a compact SUV. The mu-X, though slightly more expensive, is a current model with a robust 177 PS diesel turbo engine delivering 380 Nm torque (much higher torque), ideal for towing or off-road. It's larger (4,825 mm long, 1,860 mm wide) and has a 4-door body, suggesting more passenger/cargo space. The Escape's FWD and gas engine suit city driving and fuel efficiency, while the mu-X's RWD and diesel are better for long-distance or rugged use. Both have 6-speed A/T and 5 seats. If you prioritize lower price, gas engine, and compact size for urban commuting, choose the Escape. If you need a current model, diesel torque, larger size, and potential for off-road or heavy loads, the mu-X is better. The mu-X's higher torque and RWD also make it more capable for provincial roads.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Escape is cheaper at ₱1,790,000, while the Isuzu mu-X costs ₱1,845,000, a difference of ₱55,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Escape has slightly higher power at 178 PS vs 177 PS for the mu-X, but the mu-X has much higher torque (380 Nm vs 249 Nm), making it better for heavy loads.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Ford Escape, with its gas engine and FWD, is more suited for city driving and likely better fuel economy, while the mu-X's diesel and RWD are better for long drives or rough roads.
Which has more space?
The Isuzu mu-X is larger (4,825 mm long, 1,860 mm wide) compared to the Ford Escape (1,524 mm long), offering more interior and cargo space.