Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Honda HR-V 1.8 E CVT Modulo (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Honda HR-V 1.8 E CVT Modulo (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) Ford ₱1,539,000 | Honda HR-V 1.8 E CVT Modulo (2015) Honda ₱1,430,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000kms/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1798cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged CRDI | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 141 PS @ 6500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600 rpm | 172 Nm @ 4300 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4893 | 4294 |
| Width (mm) | 1862 | 1772 |
| Height (mm) | 1836 | 1605 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2610 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1263 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Live Axle | Axle Type |
| Front Wheels | 20" Alloys | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 20" Alloys | 17 |
| Front Tires | 265/50 R20 | 215/55 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50 R20 | 215/55 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | Yes |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Honda HR-V 1.8 E CVT Modulo (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer deciding between the 2015 Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT and the 2015 Honda HR‑V 1.8 E CVT Modulo, the choice hinges on intended use and budget. The Everest costs ₱1,539,000, about ₱109,000 more than the HR‑V, but it offers a far larger 4.9‑meter body, three‑row seating (2+3+2), and a robust 2.2‑litre turbo‑charged diesel engine delivering 160 PS and 385 Nm of torque. Its body‑on‑frame construction and rear‑wheel‑drive layout make it better suited for heavy loads, occasional off‑road or rough‑road conditions, and families needing extra passenger capacity. However, the Everest is discontinued, so parts and service may be less readily available, and its fuel consumption will be higher than the HR‑V’s 1.8‑litre naturally aspirated gasoline engine, which produces 141 PS and 172 Nm, is lighter, and comes with a CVT that favors city driving. The HR‑V’s unibody design, shorter 4.3‑meter length, and front‑wheel‑drive layout provide tighter maneuverability and lower running costs, ideal for daily commuting and urban parking. Both carry the same 100,000 km/3‑year warranty. Choose the Everest if you need three‑row space, higher torque for hauling, and occasional rugged use, and you can accept a higher price and potential service constraints. Opt for the HR‑V if you prioritize affordability, fuel‑efficiency, easier city driving, and a newer, still‑available model.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Honda HR‑V 1.8 E CVT Modulo is priced at ₱1,430,000, which is ₱109,000 less than the Ford Everest 2.2 Trend’s ₱1,539,000 price tag.
Which model has more power and torque?
The Ford Everest’s 2.2‑litre turbo diesel produces 160 PS and 385 Nm of torque, whereas the Honda HR‑V’s 1.8‑litre gasoline engine makes 141 PS and 172 Nm.
Which is better for daily city commuting?
The Honda HR‑V, with its smaller 4.3 m length, front‑wheel‑drive layout, unibody construction and CVT, offers better maneuverability and likely lower fuel consumption, making it more suitable for city use.
Is either model discontinued?
Yes, the Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT is listed as discontinued, while the Honda HR‑V remains a current model.