Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-A 4×2 AT Dsl (2015)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-A 4×2 AT Dsl (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) Ford ₱1,539,000 Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-A 4×2 AT Dsl (2015) Isuzu ₱1,448,000
Overview
Model Year 2015 2015
Warranty 100,000km/3-years 100,000km/3-years
Availability Discontinued Discontinued
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 2198cc 2499cc
Valvetrain DOHC 16valve DOHC 16-valve
Aspiration Turbocharged CRDI Turbo Intercooled, VGS
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Max Power 160 PS @ 3200 rpm 163 PS @ 3200 rpm
Max Torque 385 Nm @ 1600 rpm 380 Nm @ 1800 - 2200 rpm
Transmission 6-Speed A/T 5-Speed A/T
Drivetrain RWD RWD
Body & Dimensions
Body Type SUV SUV
Segment J J
Construction Body-on-frame
Doors 5 5
Seating Capacity 2+3+2 2+3+2
Length (mm) 4893 4825
Width (mm) 1862 1860
Height (mm) 1836 1840
Wheelbase (mm) 2850 2845
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension Double Wishbone Double Wishbone w/ Coil Springs, Stabilizer
Rear Suspension Live Axle Five-Link Coil Spring, Stabilizer
Front Wheels 20" Alloys 17-inch alloys
Rear Wheels 20" Alloys 17-inch alloys
Front Tires 265/50 R20 255/65/R17
Rear Tires 265/50 R20 255/65/R17
Front Brakes Disc Disc
Rear Brakes Disc Disc
Steering Type Hydraulic hydraulic
Steering Column tilt tilt
Tire Pressure Monitoring No No
Differential Lock No No
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) Yes Yes
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution Yes Yes
Brake Assist No Yes
Parking Sensors Yes No
Stability Control Yes No
Traction Control Yes No
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist Yes No
Hill Descent Control No No
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag Yes No
Knee Airbag No No
Passenger Airbag Yes No
Front Curtain Airbags Yes No
Rear Curtain Airbags Yes No
Rear Side Airbags Yes No
Engine Immobilizer No No
Security Alarm Yes Yes
Door Locking Central Locking Central Locking
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control
Rear A/C Vents Yes Yes
Seat Material Leather Leather
Parking Brake Manual Manual
Key Type Keyless Entry Keyless Entry
Push-Button Start No No
Cruise Control Yes No
Multi-Info Display Yes Yes
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera No Yes
Auto Headlights Yes No
Power Windows Yes Yes
Power Seats Yes Yes
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode No No
Antenna yes yes
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 10
Touchscreen Yes Yes
Navigation No Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
Apple CarPlay No No
Android Auto No No
USB Yes Yes
AUX Input Yes Yes
AM/FM Radio Yes Yes
CD Player Yes Yes
DVD Player No Yes
MP3 Playback Yes Yes
iPod Support Yes Yes
SD Card Slot Yes No
Lighting
Headlights Halogen HID + Foglamps
Fog Lights Yes Yes
Daytime Running Lights No No
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-A 4×2 AT Dsl (2015): which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer weighing the Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) against the Isuzu mu‑X 3.0 LS‑A 4×2 AT Dsl (2015), the decision hinges on price, power, and practicality. The Everest is priced at ₱1,539,000 while the mu‑X comes in at ₱1,448,000, giving the mu‑X a cost advantage of ₱91,000. In terms of performance, the mu‑X’s 2.5 L engine produces a slightly higher peak power of 163 PS versus the Everest’s 160 PS, and delivers a comparable torque (380 Nm vs. 385 Nm). However, the mu‑X’s engine is turbo‑intercooled with VGS technology, potentially offering better low‑end torque across a broader rpm range (380 Nm at 1800–2200 rpm) compared to the Everest’s single turbocharged CRDI. Both vehicles share a 5‑door SUV layout, RWD drivetrain, and 2+3+2 seating. The mu‑X is marginally shorter (4825 mm vs. 4893 mm) and wider (1860 mm), which may translate to slightly tighter interior space. Both models are discontinued and carry the same 100,000 km/3‑year warranty. If budget is a priority and you want the slightly more powerful engine, the mu‑X is preferable. If you value a marginally larger footprint and a different brand heritage, the Everest remains an option but at a higher price.

Frequently asked questions

Which model is cheaper?

The Isuzu mu‑X 3.0 LS‑A is priced at ₱1,448,000, while the Ford Everest 2.2 Trend is ₱1,539,000, making the mu‑X cheaper by ₱91,000.

Which vehicle has more power?

The Isuzu mu‑X produces 163 PS at 3200 rpm, slightly higher than the Ford Everest’s 160 PS at the same rpm.

Which model offers better torque?

Both engines deliver similar peak torque (385 Nm for the Everest and 380 Nm for the mu‑X), but the mu‑X’s torque is available over a broader rpm range (1800–2200 rpm).

Are there any differences in size?

The mu‑X is 4825 mm long and 1860 mm wide, while the Everest measures 4893 mm in length; width for the Everest is not provided.