Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-A 4×2 AT Dsl (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-A 4×2 AT Dsl (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) Ford ₱1,539,000 | Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-A 4×2 AT Dsl (2015) Isuzu ₱1,448,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 2499cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged CRDI | Turbo Intercooled, VGS |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 163 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800 - 2200 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | — |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4893 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1862 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1836 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2845 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Springs, Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Live Axle | Five-Link Coil Spring, Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 20" Alloys | 17-inch alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 20" Alloys | 17-inch alloys |
| Front Tires | 265/50 R20 | 255/65/R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50 R20 | 255/65/R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | HID + Foglamps |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-A 4×2 AT Dsl (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing the Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) against the Isuzu mu‑X 3.0 LS‑A 4×2 AT Dsl (2015), the decision hinges on price, power, and practicality. The Everest is priced at ₱1,539,000 while the mu‑X comes in at ₱1,448,000, giving the mu‑X a cost advantage of ₱91,000. In terms of performance, the mu‑X’s 2.5 L engine produces a slightly higher peak power of 163 PS versus the Everest’s 160 PS, and delivers a comparable torque (380 Nm vs. 385 Nm). However, the mu‑X’s engine is turbo‑intercooled with VGS technology, potentially offering better low‑end torque across a broader rpm range (380 Nm at 1800–2200 rpm) compared to the Everest’s single turbocharged CRDI. Both vehicles share a 5‑door SUV layout, RWD drivetrain, and 2+3+2 seating. The mu‑X is marginally shorter (4825 mm vs. 4893 mm) and wider (1860 mm), which may translate to slightly tighter interior space. Both models are discontinued and carry the same 100,000 km/3‑year warranty. If budget is a priority and you want the slightly more powerful engine, the mu‑X is preferable. If you value a marginally larger footprint and a different brand heritage, the Everest remains an option but at a higher price.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu‑X 3.0 LS‑A is priced at ₱1,448,000, while the Ford Everest 2.2 Trend is ₱1,539,000, making the mu‑X cheaper by ₱91,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Isuzu mu‑X produces 163 PS at 3200 rpm, slightly higher than the Ford Everest’s 160 PS at the same rpm.
Which model offers better torque?
Both engines deliver similar peak torque (385 Nm for the Everest and 380 Nm for the mu‑X), but the mu‑X’s torque is available over a broader rpm range (1800–2200 rpm).
Are there any differences in size?
The mu‑X is 4825 mm long and 1860 mm wide, while the Everest measures 4893 mm in length; width for the Everest is not provided.