Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-A 4×2 AT (White Pearl) Dsl (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-A 4×2 AT (White Pearl) Dsl (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) Ford ₱1,539,000 | Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-A 4×2 AT (White Pearl) Dsl (2015) Isuzu ₱1,458,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 2499cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged CRDI | Turbo Intercooled, VGS |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 163 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800 - 2200 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | — |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4893 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1862 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1836 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2845 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Springs, Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Live Axle | Five-Link Coil Spring, Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 20" Alloys | 17-inch alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 20" Alloys | 17-inch alloys |
| Front Tires | 265/50 R20 | 255/65/R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50 R20 | 255/65/R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | HID + Foglamps |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-A 4×2 AT (White Pearl) Dsl (2015): which should you buy?
Both the 2015 Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT and the 2015 Isuzu mu‑X 3.0 LS‑A 4×2 AT are discontinued, five‑door, body‑on‑frame SUVs that seat up to seven and come with the same 100,000 km/3‑year warranty. The Everest is priced at ₱1,539,000, about ₱81,000 more than the mu‑X’s ₱1,458,000, but it offers a slightly higher torque figure (385 Nm @ 1 600 rpm vs 380 Nm @ 1 800‑2 200 rpm) and a smoother 6‑speed automatic compared to the mu‑X’s 5‑speed unit. Power is marginally lower on the Everest (160 PS vs 163 PS), while the mu‑X’s larger 2 499 cc engine gives it a modest power edge. In dimensions, the mu‑X is a bit shorter (4 825 mm vs 4 893 mm) and narrower (1 860 mm, the Everest width is not listed), which may aid city maneuverability. If you prioritize a lower upfront cost, a slightly more powerful engine, and a more compact footprint for urban use, the Isuzu mu‑X is the better pick. If you value higher torque at lower rpm for heavy loads, a smoother 6‑speed transmission, and can afford the premium, the Ford Everest suits buyers who need extra pulling power and a smoother drive.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu‑X 3.0 LS‑A is priced at ₱1,458,000, which is ₱81,000 less than the Ford Everest’s ₱1,539,000.
Which SUV has more power?
The Isuzu mu‑X produces 163 PS, slightly more than the Ford Everest’s 160 PS.
Which vehicle offers higher torque?
The Ford Everest delivers 385 Nm of torque at 1 600 rpm, a bit higher than the mu‑X’s 380 Nm available from 1 800‑2 200 rpm.
Is there a difference in transmission?
Yes, the Everest comes with a 6‑speed automatic, while the mu‑X is equipped with a 5‑speed automatic.