Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Mazda CX-5 2.0 SkyActiv Pro AT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Mazda CX-5 2.0 SkyActiv Pro AT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) Ford ₱1,539,000 | Mazda CX-5 2.0 SkyActiv Pro AT (2015) Mazda ₱1,495,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1988cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged CRDI | Naturally Aspirated, i-STOP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 155 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600 rpm | 200 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4893 | 4540 |
| Width (mm) | 1862 | 1840 |
| Height (mm) | 1836 | 1670 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2700 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1451 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | MacPherson Strut |
| Rear Suspension | Live Axle | Multi-Link |
| Front Wheels | 20" Alloys | 17x7.0-inch alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 20" Alloys | 17x7.0-inch alloys |
| Front Tires | 265/50 R20 | 225/65/R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50 R20 | 225/65/R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | — |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED + Foglamps |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | — |
Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Mazda CX-5 2.0 SkyActiv Pro AT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, power and practicality, the Mazda CX‑5 2.0 SkyActiv Pro AT (₱1,495,000) edges out the Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (₱1,539,000) if daily driving, fuel economy and maneuverability are priorities. The CX‑5 is cheaper by ₱44,000, lighter at 4,540 mm long and built on a unibody platform, offering tighter handling and better fuel efficiency thanks to its naturally aspirated gasoline engine (155 PS, 200 Nm). Its five‑seat layout suits typical family use, while the Everest’s larger 4,893 mm body‑on‑frame SUV provides three rows (2+3+2) and higher torque (385 Nm) for heavy loads or off‑road excursions, albeit with a higher price and RWD layout. Both carry the same 100,000 km/3‑year warranty and six‑speed automatic, but the Everest’s turbo‑diesel delivers 160 PS and superior low‑end torque, making it more capable for towing or steep terrain. Choose the Everest if you need three‑row seating, higher torque for cargo or rough roads, and can accommodate the extra cost. Opt for the CX‑5 if you prefer a lower price, better fuel‑friendly gasoline engine, easier city driving, and a more compact footprint.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Mazda CX‑5 2.0 SkyActiv Pro AT is priced at ₱1,495,000, which is ₱44,000 less than the Ford Everest 2.2 Trend at ₱1,539,000.
Which SUV has more power and torque?
The Ford Everest 2.2 Trend produces 160 PS and 385 Nm of torque, while the Mazda CX‑5 2.0 SkyActiv Pro delivers 155 PS and 200 Nm, making the Everest more powerful, especially in low‑rpm torque.
What are the seating capacities?
The Everest offers three rows with a 2+3+2 seating layout, whereas the CX‑5 provides a single row of five seats (2+3).
Which vehicle is better suited for city driving?
The Mazda CX‑5’s smaller length (4,540 mm), unibody construction and gasoline engine make it more maneuverable and fuel‑efficient for typical urban commuting compared to the larger, body‑on‑frame, diesel‑powered Everest.