Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi CVT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi CVT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) Ford ₱1,539,000 | Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi CVT (2016) Honda ₱1,535,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1496cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | SOHC 16-valve i-VTEC |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged CRDI | Naturally Aspirated, Hybrid |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas/Electric |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 135 PS @ 6600 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600 rpm | 171 Nm @ 4800 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 7-Speed CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Segment | J | B |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4893 | 4301 |
| Width (mm) | 1862 | 1740 |
| Height (mm) | 1836 | 1395 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2435 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1155 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 40 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Live Axle | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 20" Alloys | 17 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 20" Alloys | 17 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 265/50 R20 | 205/45 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50 R20 | 205/45 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | — |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | keyless Auto |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Air Conditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather and Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Electronic |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Smart Key Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi CVT (2016): which should you buy?
These two vehicles could hardly be more different despite their similar price tags. The Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4x2 AT is a proper 7-seater SUV built on a body-on-frame chassis, making it ideal for large families and those who need off-road capability, towing power, or a commanding driving position. Its turbo diesel engine produces 160 PS and a massive 385 Nm of torque, delivering strong pulling power for cargo or trailers. The Honda CR-Z, on the other hand, is a compact hybrid coupe with a 1.5L gas engine and an electric motor, offering 135 PS and 171 Nm paired with a CVT. It is front-wheel drive and seats only 4, with a 3-door layout. The Everest is far more practical, spacious, and versatile, but consumes diesel and is larger. The CR-Z is more efficient for urban commutes (hybrid system) and has a sporty, attention-grabbing design, but lacks rear space and cargo room. For a Filipino family needing one car for all purposes, the Everest is the clear choice. For a single person or couple wanting a fuel-efficient, stylish daily driver with a fun driving character, the CR-Z might appeal, but it is discontinued and parts may be harder to find. Overall, the Everest wins on outright practicality and value for money.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Everest costs ₱1,539,000 and the Honda CR-Z costs ₱1,535,000, so they are nearly identical in price.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Everest has higher output: 160 PS and 385 Nm of torque (diesel), versus the Honda CR-Z's 135 PS and 171 Nm (gas-electric). The Everest's torque is more than double.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Honda CR-Z, being a hybrid, offers better fuel economy in stop-and-go traffic. However, its low ground clearance and sporty coupe design make it less practical for rough roads or carrying many passengers.
Which has more seats?
The Ford Everest seats 7 (2+3+2 configuration), while the Honda CR-Z seats 4 (2+2). The Everest is far more suitable for families or group travel.