Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT 2-Tone (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT 2-Tone (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) Ford ₱1,539,000 | Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT 2-Tone (2016) Honda ₱1,470,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1496cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | SOHC 16-valve i-VTEC |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged CRDI | Naturally Aspirated, Hybrid |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas/Electric |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 136 PS @ 6600 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600 rpm | 171 Nm @ 4800 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Segment | J | B |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4893 | 4301 |
| Width (mm) | 1862 | 1740 |
| Height (mm) | 1836 | 1395 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2435 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1155 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 40 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Live Axle | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 20" Alloys | 17 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 20" Alloys | 17 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 265/50 R20 | 205/45 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50 R20 | 205/45 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | — |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | keyless Auto |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Air Conditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather and Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Electronic |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 6-Speakers |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT 2-Tone (2016): which should you buy?
The Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) is the better value for most Filipino buyers, priced at ₱1,539,000 versus ₱1,470,000. Its 160 PS diesel engine delivers significantly more torque (385 Nm vs 171 Nm) and is paired with a 6-speed A/T transmission, making it more capable for Philippine road conditions. The Everest’s SUV body-on-frame construction and 5-door layout offer better practicality for passengers and cargo, while the Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT 2-Tone (2016) is lighter (4301 mm vs 4893 mm) but lacks the torque advantage and practicality for Filipino needs. Choose the Everest for daily commuting or hauling; opt for the CR-Z if you prioritize fuel efficiency and prefer a compact coupe.