Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Mazda 3 Hatchback SkyActiv-R SPEED AT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Mazda 3 Hatchback SkyActiv-R SPEED AT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) Ford ₱1,539,000 | Mazda 3 Hatchback SkyActiv-R SPEED AT (2017) Mazda ₱1,490,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged CRDI | Naturally Aspirated, S-VT |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 155 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600 rpm | 200 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Segment | J | C |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4893 | 4460 |
| Width (mm) | 1862 | 1795 |
| Height (mm) | 1836 | 1450 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2700 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1310 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Live Axle | Multi-Link |
| Front Wheels | 20" Alloys | 18x7.0 |
| Rear Wheels | 20" Alloys | 18x7.0 |
| Front Tires | 265/50 R20 | 215/45/R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50 R20 | 215/45/R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | HID + Foglamps |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Mazda 3 Hatchback SkyActiv-R SPEED AT (2017): which should you buy?
The Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (₱1,539,000) is better for Filipino buyers prioritizing off-road capability and durability, while the Mazda 3 Hatchback SkyActiv-R SPEED AT (₱1,490,000) offers better fuel efficiency and suitability for urban driving. The Everest costs ₱49,000 more but delivers higher torque (385 Nm vs 200 Nm) and 160 PS vs 155 PS, making it more powerful for challenging terrain. Its RWD layout and 5-door design with 2+3+2 capacity provide superior practicality for families or off-road enthusiasts. The Mazda is lighter (4460 mm vs 4893 mm) and better suited for daily commuting, but lacks the Everest’s torque advantage. Choose the Everest if budget allows and you need reliability in tough conditions; opt for the Mazda if fuel economy and city adaptability matter most.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Mazda 3 Hatchback SkyActiv-R SPEED AT costs ₱1,490,000, while the Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT is ₱1,539,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Everest produces 160 PS vs 155 PS, with 385 Nm vs 200 Nm torque.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mazda 3 has a shorter length (4460 mm vs 4893 mm) and uses gas, making it more practical for city driving.
What is the warranty coverage?
Both vehicles have a 100,000km/3-years warranty.