Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 RZ4E MT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 RZ4E MT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) Ford ₱1,539,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 RZ4E MT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,570,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1898cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged CRDI | Turbocharged Intercooled, VGS |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 150 PS @ 3600 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600 rpm | 350 Nm @ 1800 - 2600 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 16.5:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4893 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1862 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1836 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2845 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | Double Wishbone, Coil Springs |
| Rear Suspension | Live Axle | Multi-Link |
| Front Wheels | 20" Alloys | 18 alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 20" Alloys | 18 alloy |
| Front Tires | 265/50 R20 | 255/60/R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50 R20 | 255/60/R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 RZ4E MT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing a mid‑size SUV’s price, power and availability, the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 (2018) edges out the older Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 (2015). Both are body‑on‑frame, five‑door J‑segment SUVs with the same 2+3+2 seating layout, but the mu‑X is a current model while the Everest is discontinued, meaning spare parts and dealer support will be easier for the Isuzu. The mu‑X is slightly more expensive by ₱31,000, yet it offers a newer engine with a higher compression ratio (16.5:1) and a broader torque band (350 Nm from 1800‑2600 rpm) that can feel smoother in everyday driving. The Everest produces a bit more peak power (160 PS vs 150 PS) and higher maximum torque (385 Nm at 1600 rpm), but that torque is concentrated at a lower rpm and may not translate into a noticeable advantage for typical city or highway use. Both have the same warranty terms (3 years/100,000 km) and drivetrain (RWD), but the mu‑X’s manual 6‑speed gearbox may appeal to drivers who prefer more control, whereas the Everest’s automatic could be more convenient. If you value newer model support, a smoother torque curve and don’t mind a modest price premium, choose the Isuzu mu‑X. If you prioritize a slightly higher power figure and prefer an automatic, the Ford Everest could still be considered, provided you are comfortable with a discontinued model.
Frequently asked questions
Which SUV is cheaper?
The Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 (2015) is priced at ₱1,539,000, which is ₱31,000 less than the Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 (2018) priced at ₱1,570,000.
Which model has more power?
The Ford Everest produces 160 PS at 3,200 rpm, while the Isuzu mu‑X delivers 150 PS at 3,600 rpm, so the Everest has a slightly higher peak power.
Which SUV offers a newer model year and better dealer support?
The Isuzu mu‑X is a 2018 model and listed as currently available, whereas the Ford Everest is a 2015 model that has been discontinued, making the mu‑X likely to have better parts availability and dealer support.
Is the torque delivery better in one of the vehicles?
The Isuzu mu‑X provides 350 Nm across a broader range of 1,800‑2,600 rpm, offering smoother performance, while the Ford Everest’s 385 Nm peaks at a low 1,600 rpm and drops off sharply.