Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Toyota Fortuner 2.4 G 4×2 MT (2018)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Toyota Fortuner 2.4 G 4×2 MT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) Ford ₱1,539,000 Toyota Fortuner 2.4 G 4×2 MT (2018) Toyota ₱1,592,000
Overview
Model Year 2015 2018
Warranty 100,000km/3-years 100,000km/3-years
Availability Discontinued Current
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 2198cc 2393cc
Valvetrain DOHC 16valve DOHC 16-valve
Aspiration Turbocharged CRDI VN Turbo Intercooler CRDI
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Max Power 160 PS @ 3200 rpm 149 PS @ 3400 rpm
Max Torque 385 Nm @ 1600 rpm 400 Nm @ 1600-2000 rpm
Transmission 6-Speed A/T 6-Speed M/T
Drivetrain RWD RWD
Body & Dimensions
Body Type SUV SUV
Segment J J
Construction Body-on-frame Body-on-frame
Doors 5 5
Seating Capacity 2+3+2 2+3+2
Length (mm) 4893 4795
Width (mm) 1862 1855
Height (mm) 1836 1835
Wheelbase (mm) 2850 2745
Curb Weight (kg) 1780
Fuel Tank (L) 80
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension Double Wishbone Double Wishbone
Rear Suspension Live Axle 4-Link, Coil Springs
Front Wheels 20" Alloys 17x7.5
Rear Wheels 20" Alloys 17x7.5
Front Tires 265/50 R20 265/65 R17
Rear Tires 265/50 R20 265/65 R17
Front Brakes Disc Disc
Rear Brakes Disc Disc
Steering Type Hydraulic Power
Steering Column tilt Tilt & Telescopic
Tire Pressure Monitoring No No
Differential Lock No No
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) Yes Yes
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution Yes Yes
Brake Assist No Yes
Parking Sensors Yes Yes
Stability Control Yes No
Traction Control Yes No
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist Yes No
Hill Descent Control No No
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag Yes Yes
Knee Airbag No Yes
Passenger Airbag Yes Yes
Front Curtain Airbags Yes No
Rear Curtain Airbags Yes No
Rear Side Airbags Yes No
Engine Immobilizer No Yes
Security Alarm Yes Yes
Door Locking Central Locking Central Locking
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control Auto Climate Control
Rear A/C Vents Yes Yes
Seat Material Leather Fabric
Parking Brake Manual Manual
Key Type Keyless Entry Keyless Entry
Push-Button Start No No
Cruise Control Yes No
Multi-Info Display Yes Yes
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera No No
Auto Headlights Yes No
Power Windows Yes Yes
Power Seats Yes No
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode No No
Antenna yes yes
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 10 6
Touchscreen Yes Yes
Navigation No Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
Apple CarPlay No No
Android Auto No No
USB Yes Yes
AUX Input Yes Yes
AM/FM Radio Yes Yes
CD Player Yes Yes
DVD Player No No
MP3 Playback Yes Yes
iPod Support Yes Yes
SD Card Slot Yes No
Lighting
Headlights Halogen Halogen
Fog Lights Yes Yes
Daytime Running Lights No No
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Toyota Fortuner 2.4 G 4×2 MT (2018): which should you buy?

Both vehicles are J-segment SUVs with identical practicality (5 doors, 2+3+2 seating) and drivetrain (RWD, body-on-frame). The Ford Everest is the better value at ₱1,539,000 versus ₱1,592,000. The Toyota Fortuner offers more torque (400 Nm vs 385 Nm) and a higher power rating (149 PS vs 160 PS), but the price difference is significant. Choose the Ford Everest if budget is the primary concern; opt for the Toyota Fortuner if you prioritize higher power and torque for demanding terrain.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper?

The Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) costs ₱1,539,000, while the Toyota Fortuner 2.4 G 4×2 MT (2018) costs ₱1,592,000.

Which is more powerful?

The Ford Everest delivers 160 PS, while the Toyota Fortuner delivers 149 PS.

Which has more torque?

The Toyota Fortuner produces 400 Nm, compared to 385 Nm from the Ford Everest.

Are both suitable for daily commuting?

Yes, both have the same seating capacity (2+3+2) and are RWD SUVs, making them suitable for daily commuting.