Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Mazda 3 Fastback 2.0L Sport (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Mazda 3 Fastback 2.0L Sport (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) Ford ₱1,539,000 | Mazda 3 Fastback 2.0L Sport (2024) Mazda ₱1,510,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16V |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged CRDI | — |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 155 PS @ 6,000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600 rpm | 200 Nm @ 4,000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic 6-Speed |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 13:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Segment | J | Hatchback |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4893 | 4460 |
| Width (mm) | 1862 | 1795 |
| Height (mm) | 1836 | 1440 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2725 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Soul Red Metallic |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1348 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 51 L |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | MacPherson Strut |
| Rear Suspension | Live Axle | Torsion Beam Axle |
| Front Wheels | 20" Alloys | — |
| Rear Wheels | 20" Alloys | — |
| Front Tires | 265/50 R20 | — |
| Rear Tires | 265/50 R20 | — |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Ventilated Discs |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Solid Discs |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | — |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | — |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control, Dual-Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather Seats |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Electric Parking Brake |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | — |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 12-Speaker BOSE® Sound System |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Mazda 3 Fastback 2.0L Sport (2024): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing utility against everyday practicality, the choice hinges on lifestyle needs. The 2015 Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT costs ₱1,539,000, is a body‑on‑frame SUV with three rows of seats (2+3+2) and a 4,893 mm length, making it far more spacious for families or cargo. Its 2.2‑liter turbo‑charged diesel delivers 160 PS and a robust 385 Nm of torque at low rpm, ideal for hauling and occasional off‑road or highway pulling, though it is rear‑wheel drive and discontinued, meaning limited dealer support. The Mazda 3 Fastback 2024, priced slightly lower at ₱1,510,000, is a compact 4‑door hatchback with a 2.0‑liter gasoline engine producing 155 PS and 200 Nm, suited for city driving and fuel‑efficiency. It offers a modern 5‑year/100,000 km warranty and current availability, ensuring better after‑sales service. If you need a versatile, high‑torque vehicle for larger families, weekend trips, or cargo, the Everest is the better fit despite its older model status. If you prioritize a newer, more fuel‑efficient car for daily commuting, tighter urban maneuverability, and longer warranty coverage, the Mazda 3 Fastback is the smarter pick.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mazda 3 Fastback 2024 is priced at ₱1,510,000, which is ₱29,000 less than the Ford Everest 2.2 Trend priced at ₱1,539,000.
Which has more power and torque?
The Ford Everest produces 160 PS and 385 Nm of torque, while the Mazda 3 delivers 155 PS and 200 Nm, giving the Everest higher power and significantly more low‑end torque.
Which is more practical for a big family?
The Everest offers three rows of seats (2+3+2) and a longer body, making it far more practical for larger families compared to the Mazda 3’s two‑row, five‑seat layout.
Which has a better warranty and support?
The Mazda 3 comes with a 5‑year or 100,000 km warranty and is a current model, whereas the Everest has a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty and is discontinued, implying less dealer support.