Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Sport (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Sport (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) Ford ₱1,539,000 | Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Sport (2024) Mazda ₱1,510,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged CRDI | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 155 PS |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600 rpm | 200 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic 6-Speed |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Family Sedan |
| Segment | J | Sedan |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4893 | 4660 |
| Width (mm) | 1862 | 1795 |
| Height (mm) | 1836 | 1445 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2775 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Jet Black, Sonic Silver, Soul Red, Snowflake White Pearl, Crystal Blue |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1373 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 51 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Live Axle | Torsion beam |
| Front Wheels | 20" Alloys | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 20" Alloys | 18 |
| Front Tires | 265/50 R20 | 215/45R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50 R20 | 215/45R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 12 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Sport (2024): which should you buy?
The Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Sport (₱1,510,000) is the better value for a Filipino buyer seeking a modern, efficient sedan. While the Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (₱1,539,000) offers 160 PS of power and 5-passenger capacity, the Mazda’s 155 PS is sufficient for city driving, and it includes a 5-year/100,000 km warranty. The Mazda’s FWD platform and unibody construction support better handling in Philippine traffic, whereas the Everest’s RWD and body-on-frame design prioritize off-road capability. The Mazda is currently available, while the Everest is discontinued. Choose the Everest if you need 5 seats and off-road performance; choose the Mazda if you prioritize fuel efficiency, daily reliability, and a newer powertrain.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Sport costs ₱1,510,000, while the Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT is ₱1,539,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT delivers 160 PS, compared to the Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Sport’s 155 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Sport is more suited for daily commuting, offering 200 Nm torque and FWD, which improves traction in urban conditions.
Is the Everest still available?
The Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT is discontinued.