Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Triton GX 2WD AT (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Triton GX 2WD AT (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) Ford ₱1,539,000 | Mitsubishi Triton GX 2WD AT (2024) Mitsubishi ₱1,430,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 2442cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged CRDI | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 180 PS |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600 rpm | 430 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed AT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Segment | J | Pickup |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4893 | 5265 |
| Width (mm) | 1862 | 1865 |
| Height (mm) | 1836 | 1795 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 3130 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Yamabuki Orange, Blade Silver, Graphite Grey, Jet Black, Solid Red, White Diamond, and Solid White |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1815 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 75 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | Independent Wishbone |
| Rear Suspension | Live Axle | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 20" Alloys | 16 alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 20" Alloys | 16 alloys |
| Front Tires | 265/50 R20 | 265/70R16 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50 R20 | 265/70R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drums |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | — |
| Differential Lock | No | — |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | — |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | — |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | — |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | — |
| Hill Descent Control | No | — |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | — |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | — |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | — |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | — |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | — |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | — |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | — |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | — |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | — |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | — |
| Eco Mode | No | — |
| Antenna | yes | Yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | — |
| AUX Input | Yes | — |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | — |
| CD Player | Yes | — |
| DVD Player | No | — |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | — |
| iPod Support | Yes | — |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | — |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | — |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Triton GX 2WD AT (2024): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer who needs a family‑oriented vehicle with seven seats, the 2015 Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT is the clear choice despite being older and priced about ₱109,000 higher than the 2024 Mitsubishi Triton GX. The Everest’s SUV body‑on‑frame construction, 4‑door layout and 2+3+2 seating make it far more practical for daily commuting with a larger family or for weekend trips, while the Triton’s 4‑door pickup layout only seats five. However, if you prioritize outright performance and a newer warranty, the 2024 Triton GX offers 180 PS and 430 Nm – roughly 20 PS and 45 Nm more than the Everest – and comes with a fresh 3‑year/100,000 km warranty at a lower price of ₱1,430,000. Both share a 6‑speed automatic, RWD drivetrain and body‑on‑frame chassis, so off‑road capability is comparable. Choose the Everest if you need extra passenger capacity and prefer an SUV silhouette; choose the Triton if you want more power, a newer model, and a lower price, and you can live with a pickup’s limited seating.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mitsubishi Triton GX 2WD AT (2024) is cheaper at ₱1,430,000 compared to the Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) priced at ₱1,539,000.
Which has more power and torque?
The Triton GX delivers 180 PS and 430 Nm of torque, while the Everest provides 160 PS and 385 Nm.
Which is better for a large family?
The Ford Everest seats 2+3+2 (seven passengers) and is an SUV, making{ it more suitable } for a large family, whereas the Triton seats only 2+3.
Are both models still available?
The Everest is discontinued, while the Triton GX is a current 2024 model and available for purchase.