Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Xforce GT CVT (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Xforce GT CVT (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) Ford ₱1,539,000 | Mitsubishi Xforce GT CVT (2024) Mitsubishi ₱1,581,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1499cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged CRDI | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 105 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600 rpm | 141 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Small Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Crossover |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4893 | 4390 |
| Width (mm) | 1862 | 1810 |
| Height (mm) | 1836 | 1660 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2650 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Energetic Yellow, White Pearl, Blade Silver Metallic, Graphite Gray Metallic |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1250 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 42 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Live Axle | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 20" Alloys | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 20" Alloys | 18 |
| Front Tires | 265/50 R20 | 225/50/R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50 R20 | 225/50/R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Xforce GT CVT (2024): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, power and everyday practicality, the Mitsubishi Xforce GT CVT edges out the older Ford Everest 2.2 Trend. Both are priced similarly, with the Xforce at ₱1,581,000 and the Everest at ₱1,539,000, a negligible difference of ₱42,000. The Xforce, however, is a brand‑new 2024 model with a current warranty and modern unibody construction, making it lighter and more fuel‑efficient for city driving. Its 1.5‑litre naturally aspirated gasoline engine delivers 105 PS and 141 Nm, sufficient for a small crossover SUV and everyday commuting. The Everest, a 2015 body‑on‑frame SUV, packs a 2.2‑litre turbo diesel with 160 PS and 385 Nm, offering far more torque for heavy loads or off‑road use, but its RWD layout, larger dimensions and 7‑seat layout may be excessive for typical urban families. The Xforce’s five‑door layout, 5‑seat capacity and CVT provide smoother city rides, while the Everest’s 6‑speed automatic and 7‑seat configuration suit those needing extra passenger space or occasional towing. In summary, choose the Xforce if you prioritize a newer, more compact, fuel‑friendly vehicle for daily use; opt for the Everest only if you need the extra torque, seating and ruggedness of a body‑on‑frame SUV and can accept its discontinued status.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Everest is slightly cheaper at ₱1,539,000 compared to the Mitsubishi Xforce at ₱1,581,000, a difference of ₱42,000.
Which model has more power?
The Ford Everest 2.2 L turbo diesel produces 160 PS and 385 Nm, whereas the Mitsubishi Xforce 1.5 L gasoline engine makes 105 PS and 141 Nm, so the Everest is more powerful.
Which SUV is better for daily commuting in the city?
The Mitsubishi Xforce, with its smaller unibody design, gasoline engine, CVT transmission and 5‑seat layout, is better suited for city commuting than the larger, body‑on‑frame, 7‑seat Everest.
What are the warranty and availability differences?
Both offer a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty, but the Xforce is a current 2024 model, while the Everest is discontinued and from 2015.