Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium 4×4 AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium 4×4 AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium 4×4 AT (2015) Ford ₱1,989,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3198cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged CRDI | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4893 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1862 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1836 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2845 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Live Axle | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 20 | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 20 | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 265/50 R20 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50 R20 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Power Asisted |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium 4×4 AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers, the choice between the Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium 4×4 AT (2015) and the Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) hinges on priorities. The Everest, though discontinued and older, offers superior off-road capability with its 4WD system, body-on-frame construction, and more powerful 200 PS engine with 470 Nm torque—ideal for provincial roads, towing, or rugged terrain. It also seats 7 (2+3+2 layout) and is slightly longer. However, its higher price (₱1,989,000 vs ₱1,845,000) and discontinued status mean no warranty beyond existing coverage and potentially pricier maintenance. The mu-X, being a current model, provides peace of mind with a fresh warranty and lower cost. Its 177 PS and 380 Nm are adequate for daily commuting and highway driving, while the 5-seat configuration and RWD drivetrain suffice for most urban families. For typical Metro Manila use and budget-conscious buyers, the mu-X offers better value and long-term reliability. Off-road enthusiasts or those needing 7 seats should consider the Everest, but must account for its age and availability.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper between the Ford Everest and Isuzu mu-X?
The Isuzu mu-X is cheaper at ₱1,845,000 compared to the Ford Everest at ₱1,989,000.
Which vehicle has more power and torque?
The Ford Everest has higher output: 200 PS and 470 Nm, versus the Isuzu mu-X's 177 PS and 380 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Isuzu mu-X is better for daily commuting due to its lower price, newer model, and RWD efficiency. The Ford Everest's 4WD adds weight and fuel cost.
Which seats more passengers?
The Ford Everest seats 7 (2+3+2), while the Isuzu mu-X seats only 5 (2+3).