Ford Mustang 2.3 EcoBoost Coupe AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Mustang 2.3 EcoBoost Coupe AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Mustang 2.3 EcoBoost Coupe AT (2015) Ford ₱2,509,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱2,145,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2253cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 310 PS @ 5500 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 434 Nm @ 3000 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Segment | S | J |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4783 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1915 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1382 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2720 | 2845 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w Stabilizer | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 19 | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 19 | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 255/40 R19 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 255/40 R19 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Power Asisted |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Mustang 2.3 EcoBoost Coupe AT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
The Ford Mustang 2.3 EcoBoost Coupe AT (2015) and Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) serve completely different purposes. The Mustang is a discontinued 2-door sports coupe with a turbocharged gas engine producing 310 PS and 434 Nm of torque, rear-wheel drive, and a 2+2 seating capacity. It is priced at ₱2,509,000, making it more expensive than the mu-X. The mu-X is a current 4-door SUV with a diesel engine producing 177 PS and 380 Nm, 4WD, and seating for 7 (2+3+2). It costs ₱2,145,000, which is ₱364,000 less than the Mustang. For a Filipino buyer, the choice depends on priorities: if you want raw power, sporty driving, and a coupe lifestyle, the Mustang is the pick. However, for practicality, off-road capability, fuel efficiency (diesel), and family use, the mu-X is the clear winner. The mu-X is also more affordable and still in production, with better ground clearance and cargo space. The Mustang is better for enthusiasts seeking thrills, while the mu-X suits daily commuting, long trips, and rough roads. Neither is objectively better; it's about matching the vehicle to your needs.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×4 3.0 AT (2018) is cheaper at ₱2,145,000 compared to the Ford Mustang 2.3 EcoBoost Coupe AT (2015) at ₱2,509,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Mustang has more power with 310 PS and 434 Nm of torque, while the Isuzu mu-X produces 177 PS and 380 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Isuzu mu-X is better for daily commuting due to its diesel engine (better fuel economy), 4WD for various road conditions, and 7-seat capacity for family use. The Mustang is a 2+2 coupe with a gas engine, less practical for everyday use.
Which has more seating capacity?
The Isuzu mu-X seats 7 (2+3+2), while the Ford Mustang seats only 4 (2+2).