Ford Ranger Base 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Base 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Base 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) Ford ₱889,000 | Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) Suzuki ₱865,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1373cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Fuel Injection |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 120 PS @ 3700 rpm | 96 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 285 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 4-Speed AT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | MPV |
| Segment | Pick-Up | M |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4265 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1716 | 1985 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2740 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 45 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1185 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16'' Steel | 15'' Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 16'' Steel | 15'' Alloys |
| Front Tires | 215/70 R16 | 185/65 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 215/70 R16 | 185/65 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | tilt + tele |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Single Zone Automatic | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Standard Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Base 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer comparing the Ford Ranger Base 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) at ₱889,000 and the Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) at ₱865,000, the choice depends on your primary need. The Ranger is a body-on-frame pickup with a turbo diesel engine producing 120 PS and 285 Nm of torque, making it ideal for heavy-duty work, off-road use, or towing. It has a 5-speed manual transmission and RWD, suited for rugged tasks. However, it is discontinued, seats only 5 (2+3), and has a longer wheelbase (5277 mm). The Ertiga is a unibody MPV with a gasoline engine (96 PS, 130 Nm) and a 4-speed automatic transmission, better for daily commuting and family use. It seats 7 (2+2+3), is more fuel-efficient for city driving, and is still available. The Ertiga is cheaper by ₱24,000, has more passenger capacity, and is easier to maneuver in traffic. Choose the Ranger if you need a workhorse for hauling or off-road; choose the Ertiga for a practical, family-friendly daily driver with lower running costs.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) at ₱865,000 is cheaper than the Ford Ranger Base 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) at ₱889,000 by ₱24,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger has more power with 120 PS and 285 Nm of torque from its turbo diesel engine, compared to the Suzuki Ertiga's 96 PS and 130 Nm from its gasoline engine.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Suzuki Ertiga is better for daily commuting due to its smaller size (4265 mm length), automatic transmission, and gasoline engine, which is more suitable for city traffic and has lower fuel costs.
Which has more seating capacity?
The Suzuki Ertiga seats 7 (2+2+3), while the Ford Ranger seats only 5 (2+3). The Ertiga is better for families or groups.