Ford Ranger Single Cab 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Single Cab 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Single Cab 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) Ford ₱769,000 | Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) Suzuki ₱763,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1590cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 120 PS @ 3700 rpm | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm |
| Max Torque | 285 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick-up | MPV AUV |
| Segment | Pick-Up | MPV |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2 | 3+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4155 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1655 |
| Height (mm) | 1703 | 1865 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2625 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 46 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Burgundy Red Pearl, Superior White, Silky Silver |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1270 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs |
| Front Wheels | 16'' Steel | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 16'' Steel | 14 |
| Front Tires | 215/70 R16 | 185/60 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 215/70 R16 | 185/60 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | No |
| Door Locking | Standard | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Single Zone Automatic | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Vinyl | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Standard Key | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Single Cab 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Ford Ranger Single Cab 2.2L 4×2 MT and the Suzuki APV Type II GA MT boils down to purpose. The Ranger is a dedicated workhorse: a two-seater pick-up with a 2.2L turbo diesel producing 120 PS and 285 Nm of torque, ideal for heavy hauling and off-road tasks. Its body-on-frame construction and RWD drivetrain are built for durability. However, it is discontinued and seats only two. The APV, on the other hand, is a current model MPV/AUV that seats up to 8 passengers (3+3+2) with a 1.6L gasoline engine (91 PS, 127 Nm). It is more practical for family use or as a service vehicle, offering more seats and a lower price (₱763,000 vs. ₱769,000). The APV's naturally aspirated engine is less powerful but simpler to maintain. If you need a cargo-focused truck with diesel torque, choose the Ranger. If you need passenger capacity and versatility, choose the APV. The APV is also still available new, while the Ranger is discontinued.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Suzuki APV is cheaper at ₱763,000 compared to the Ford Ranger at ₱769,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger is more powerful with 120 PS and 285 Nm torque, while the Suzuki APV has 91 PS and 127 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting with family?
The Suzuki APV is better for family commuting as it seats up to 8 passengers, while the Ford Ranger only seats 2.
Which has better fuel economy?
The data does not provide fuel economy figures, but the Ranger's diesel engine typically offers better fuel efficiency for heavy loads, while the APV's smaller gasoline engine may be more economical for light use.