Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×4 MT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×4 MT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×4 MT (2015) Ford ₱1,479,000 |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
Nissan
₱1,570,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Van |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Van |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2555 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 65 |
| Construction | — | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2076 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×4 MT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×4 MT (2015) and Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) serve completely different purposes. The Ranger is a discontinued 4WD pickup with 160 PS and 385 Nm torque, ideal for off-road work or towing, priced at ₱1,479,000. The NV350 is a current 3-door van with 129 PS and 356 Nm, better for passenger or cargo transport, priced at ₱1,570,000. For a buyer needing a rugged workhorse with off-road capability, the Ranger offers more power and 4WD at a lower price, but it's discontinued. For those needing a reliable van for moving people or goods, the NV350 is newer, has a warranty, and is still available. The Ranger's 6-speed manual and 4WD suit adventurous or heavy-duty use, while the NV350's RWD and 5-speed manual are fine for urban hauling. Choose the Ranger if you prioritize power and off-road ability; choose the NV350 if you need a practical, current van.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak is cheaper at ₱1,479,000 compared to the Nissan NV350 Urvan at ₱1,570,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak has more power with 160 PS and 385 Nm torque, versus the NV350's 129 PS and 356 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan is better for daily commuting as a van with seating for up to 12 (implied), while the Ranger is a pickup with 2+3 seats and 4WD, more suited for work or off-road.
Which has better off-road capability?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak with 4WD and higher ground clearance (not specified but typical) is designed for off-road, while the NV350 is RWD and not intended for off-road use.