Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2015) Ford ₱1,709,000 |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
Nissan
₱1,570,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3198 | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Van |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Van |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 2198 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2555 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 65 |
| Construction | — | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2076 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer deciding between the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4x4 AT (2015) and the Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018), the choice hinges on intended use and budget. The Ranger, priced at ₱1,709,000, is a discontinued pickup with 200 PS and 470 Nm, making it far more powerful and capable for towing, off-roading, or heavy-duty hauling. However, its 4WD system and automatic transmission are suited for rugged terrain, not fuel efficiency. In contrast, the NV350 at ₱1,570,000 is a current-model van with 129 PS and 356 Nm, ideal for passenger transport or cargo with its body-on-frame construction. It is cheaper and newer, but less powerful and has a manual transmission. Key factors: the Ranger is only available on the used market, while the NV350 can be bought new with a 3-year/100,000-km warranty. For daily commuting, the NV350's lower price and van configuration offer better practicality for moving people or goods in urban settings. The Ranger is the pick for those needing maximum power and off-road capability.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, the Ford Ranger Wildtrak or the Nissan NV350 Urvan?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) is cheaper at ₱1,570,000, while the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2015) is priced at ₱1,709,000.
Which is more powerful, the Ford Ranger or the Nissan NV350?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak is significantly more powerful with 200 PS and 470 Nm of torque, compared to the Nissan NV350's 129 PS and 356 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting in the city?
For daily commuting, the Nissan NV350 Urvan is generally more practical due to its van body and lower price, but it has a manual transmission. The Ford Ranger is bulkier and more powerful but may be less fuel-efficient in traffic.
Which model is still available for purchase new?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan is currently available as a new vehicle, while the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2015) is discontinued and can only be found on the used market.