Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 MT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 MT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 MT (2015) Ford ₱1,649,000 |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
Nissan
₱1,570,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3198 | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Van |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Van |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 2198 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2555 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 65 |
| Construction | — | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2076 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 MT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?
Choose the Ford Ranger Wildtrak if you prioritize power, off-road capability, and towing. With a 3.2L turbo diesel inline-5 producing 200 PS and 470 Nm, paired with a 6-speed manual and 4WD, it excels in rugged conditions. Discontinued but still a capable pickup for work or adventure. Opt for the Nissan NV350 Urvan if you need a practical, current-model van for passenger or cargo transport. Its 2.5L turbo diesel (129 PS, 356 Nm) is adequate for city and highway driving, and its lower price (₱1,570,000 vs ₱1,649,000) and body-on-frame construction offer better value for fleet or family use. The Urvan is cheaper, more versatile for moving people or goods, and still in production. The Ranger is for those needing raw power and 4x4 capability; the Urvan for those needing space and value.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, the Ford Ranger Wildtrak or Nissan NV350 Urvan?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan is cheaper at ₱1,570,000, while the Ford Ranger Wildtrak costs ₱1,649,000, a difference of ₱79,000.
Which has more power and torque?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak is significantly more powerful, with 200 PS and 470 Nm of torque, compared to the Nissan NV350 Urvan's 129 PS and 356 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan is better for daily commuting due to its lower price, newer model year (2018), and more practical van body for carrying passengers or cargo. The Ford Ranger is more rugged but less fuel-efficient and less comfortable for city driving.
Which one is still available new?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan is a current model (2018) and still available, while the Ford Ranger Wildtrak is a 2015 model and discontinued.