Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) Ford ₱1,219,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Variable Turbocharger (VGS) |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) |
| Drivetrain | RWD | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Van |
| Segment | Pick-Up | M |
| Construction | Body On Frame | — |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 3 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 5080 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2940 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 65 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1825 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17" Alloys | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 17" Alloys | 15 |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 195/80R15LT |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 195/80R15LT |
| Front Brakes | Disc | — |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Power Steering |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Manual Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Single Zone Automatic | Manual, Dial Type |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Manual |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015): which should you buy?
The Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) is the better value for most Filipino buyers, priced at ₱1,219,000 versus ₱1,158,000 for the Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015). Both models share a 100,000km/3-year warranty and are discontinued, but the Ranger offers 160 PS of power vs. 129 PS, making it preferable for heavier loads. Its 4-door pickup design with 2+3 seating capacity is more versatile for work-related tasks, while the van is optimized for passenger transport with 3 seats. The Ranger’s larger length (5277 mm vs. 5080 mm) also provides better interior space. Choose the Ranger if you prioritize power, load capacity, and versatility; opt for the NV350 if budget is tighter and you need a dedicated van for passengers.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) costs ₱1,158,000, while the Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) costs ₱1,219,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) delivers 160 PS, compared to 129 PS for the Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015).
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) is better for daily commuting due to its 3-seat configuration, whereas the Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) has a 2+3 seating layout.
What is the drivetrain?
The Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) uses RWD, while the Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) is not specified.