Foton Blizzard Turbo 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) vs Isuzu D-Max 2.5 (Single Cab) 4×2 MT Dsl (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Foton Blizzard Turbo 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) vs Isuzu D-Max 2.5 (Single Cab) 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Foton Blizzard Turbo 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) Foton ₱713,000 | Isuzu D-Max 2.5 (Single Cab) 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) Isuzu ₱762,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2771cc | 2499cc |
| Valvetrain | OHV 8-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Direct Injection | Turbo Intercooler, Euro 2 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 92 PS @ 3600 rpm | 109 PS @ 3400 rpm |
| Max Torque | 202 Nm @ 2300 rpm | 280 Nm @ 1800 - 2200 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Segment | Pickup | Pickup |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 5160 | 5195 |
| Width (mm) | 1750 | 1775 |
| Height (mm) | 1730 | 1695 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3025 | 3095 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1705 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Springs, Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Axle | Semi-Elliptical Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 15x7.0" Alloys | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 15x7.0" Alloys | 15 |
| Front Tires | 225/75/R15 | 195/R16C |
| Rear Tires | 225/75/R15 | 195/R16C |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | — | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | — | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual, Three deal type |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Vinyl |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen + Foglamps | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
Foton Blizzard Turbo 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) vs Isuzu D-Max 2.5 (Single Cab) 4×2 MT Dsl (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost against performance, the Foton Blizzard Turbo 4×2 MT Dsl offers a lower entry price of ₱713,000 compared to the Isuzu D‑Max 2.5’s ₱762,000. However, the Isuzu delivers a noticeably higher power output (109 PS vs 92 PS) and torque range (280 Nm vs 202 Nm), making it better suited for heavier loads or more demanding work tasks. The Foton’s inline‑4 2771 cc engine and direct injection provide adequate power for light to moderate use, while the Isuzu’s turbo‑intercooler 2499 cc engine yields a more robust torque curve, especially at lower rpm. In terms of practicality, the Foton’s 4‑door configuration and 2+3 seating capacity accommodate more passengers or cargo, whereas the Isuzu’s single‑cab design limits seating to 2. Both vehicles share a body‑on‑frame construction, RWD drivetrain, and a 5‑speed manual transmission, ensuring similar durability for off‑road or commercial use. If budget and passenger flexibility are priorities, the Foton is preferable; if higher performance and torque for heavier work or towing are essential, the Isuzu D‑Max is the better choice.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Foton Blizzard Turbo 4×2 MT Dsl costs ₱713,000, while the Isuzu D‑Max 2.5 Single Cab 4×2 MT Dsl costs ₱762,000.
Which has more power?
The Isuzu D‑Max 2.5 produces 109 PS at 3400 rpm, higher than the Foton’s 92 PS at 3600 rpm.
Which offers more torque?
The Isuzu delivers 280 Nm between 1800–2200 rpm, compared to the Foton’s 202 Nm at 2300 rpm.
Which is better for carrying passengers?
The Foton has a 4‑door layout with seating for 2+3, while the Isuzu’s single‑cab seats only 2.