Foton Blizzard Turbo 4×4 MT Dsl (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Foton Blizzard Turbo 4×4 MT Dsl (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Foton Blizzard Turbo 4×4 MT Dsl (2015) Foton ₱890,000 | Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) Suzuki ₱865,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2771cc | 1373cc |
| Valvetrain | OHV 8-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Direct Injection | Fuel Injection |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 92 PS @ 3600 rpm | 96 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 202 Nm @ 2300 rpm | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 4-Speed AT |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | MPV |
| Segment | Pickup | M |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5160 | 4265 |
| Width (mm) | 1750 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1730 | 1985 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3025 | 2740 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1705 | 1185 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Axle | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 15x7.0" Alloys | 15'' Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 15x7.0" Alloys | 15'' Alloys |
| Front Tires | 225/75/R15 | 185/65 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 225/75/R15 | 185/65 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt + tele |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | — | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | — | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen + Foglamps | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
Foton Blizzard Turbo 4×4 MT Dsl (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, power, and daily usability, the Suzuki Ertiga GL AT emerges as the more practical choice. Priced slightly lower at ₱865,000 versus the Foton Blizzard’s ₱890,000, it offers a higher peak power of 96 PS at 6000 rpm compared to the Blizzard’s 92 PS, and a lighter engine displacement (1373 cc vs. 2771 cc) that translates to better fuel economy for city driving. The Ertiga’s front‑wheel drive, unibody construction, and five‑door layout make it easier to maneuver in tight urban streets and accommodate up to eight passengers (2+2+3 seating), ideal for families or small groups. In contrast, the Blizzard is a 4WD pickup with a body‑on‑frame chassis and only five seats (2+3), suited for off‑road or heavy-duty tasks but less convenient for everyday commuting. While the Blizzard’s diesel engine delivers a respectable 202 Nm torque at low rpm, its older model year (2015) and discontinued status may limit future support. Thus, for most Filipino buyers prioritizing affordability, passenger capacity, and everyday practicality, the Ertiga GL AT is recommended; those needing a rugged 4WD pickup for off‑road or commercial use might consider the Blizzard despite its higher price and limited seating.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Suzuki Ertiga GL AT costs ₱865,000, while the Foton Blizzard Turbo 4×4 MT Dsl is priced at ₱890,000.
Which has more power?
The Ertiga delivers 96 PS at 6000 rpm, slightly higher than the Blizzard’s 92 PS at 3600 rpm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Ertiga’s front‑wheel drive, unibody construction, five doors, and larger seating capacity make it more suitable for city driving and family use.
Which vehicle offers better torque?
The Blizzard’s diesel engine provides 202 Nm at 2300 rpm, higher than the Ertiga’s 130 Nm at 4000 rpm.