Foton Thunder Ironman 4×2 MT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Foton Thunder Ironman 4×2 MT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Foton Thunder Ironman 4×2 MT (2015) Foton ₱898,000 | Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) Suzuki ₱865,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2800cc | 1373cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Fuel Injection |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 163 PS @ 3600 rpm | 96 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 360 Nm @ 1800 rpm | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 4-Speed AT |
| Drivetrain | 2WD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | MPV |
| Segment | Pickup | M |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5320 | 4265 |
| Width (mm) | 1970 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1870 | 1985 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3105 | 2740 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1800 | 1185 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 75 | 45 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone, Spiral Spring, Swaybar | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Longitudinal Leaf Spring, Non-Independent | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17 Alloy | 15'' Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 17 Alloy | 15'' Alloys |
| Front Tires | 275/75 R17 | 185/65 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 275/75 R17 | 185/65 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt | tilt + tele |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Foton Thunder Ironman 4×2 MT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer comparing the Foton Thunder Ironman 4×2 MT (2015) and Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016), the choice depends on your primary need. If you require a rugged workhorse for hauling heavy loads or towing, the Thunder offers significantly more power (163 PS, 360 Nm) and a larger bed, all at a price of ₱898,000. However, its 5-speed manual transmission, 2WD drivetrain, and discontinued status may limit daily usability and parts availability. The Suzuki Ertiga, at ₱865,000, is cheaper, more fuel-efficient (gas engine), and seats seven in a compact MPV body—perfect for family duties and city driving. Its 4-speed automatic transmission is easier in traffic, and being a current model ensures better after-sales support. For daily commuting and family transport, the Ertiga is the practical choice. For heavy-duty tasks and raw power, the Thunder is better, but be prepared for a manual gearbox and potential service challenges. Consider resale value: the Ertiga is likely stronger due to ongoing support. Ultimately, the Ertiga wins for versatility and value, while the Thunder is a niche pick for those who prioritize strength over comfort.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Suzuki Ertiga GL AT is cheaper at ₱865,000, while the Foton Thunder Ironman 4×2 MT is ₱898,000—a difference of ₱33,000.
Which has more power?
The Foton Thunder produces 163 PS and 360 Nm of torque, far exceeding the Suzuki Ertiga's 96 PS and 130 Nm.
Which is better for a family?
The Suzuki Ertiga, with 7 seats and an automatic transmission, is designed for family use. The Foton Thunder is a 5-seat pickup with a manual gearbox, less suited for carrying passengers.
Which vehicle has better fuel efficiency?
Based on the data, the Suzuki Ertiga uses a smaller 1.3L gas engine, suggesting better fuel economy than the Foton Thunder's 2.8L turbo-diesel, but exact figures are not provided.