Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT (2015) vs Isuzu D-Max 2.5 (Single Cab) 4×2 MT Dsl (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT (2015) vs Isuzu D-Max 2.5 (Single Cab) 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT (2015) Honda ₱671,000 | Isuzu D-Max 2.5 (Single Cab) 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) Isuzu ₱762,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000kms/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1339cc | 2499cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC | Turbo Intercooler, Euro 2 |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 100 PS @ 6000 rpm | 109 PS @ 3400 rpm |
| Max Torque | 127 Nm @ 4800 rpm | 280 Nm @ 1800 - 2200 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | 18.27 | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | 20.37 | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 19.32 | — |
| Emission Standard | Euro4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Segment | A | Pickup |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 3610 | 5195 |
| Width (mm) | 1680 | 1775 |
| Height (mm) | 1485 | 1695 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2345 | 3095 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 975 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 35 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Springs, Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Semi-Elliptical Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 14x5 | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5 | 15 |
| Front Tires | 175/65 R14 | 195/R16C |
| Rear Tires | 175/65 R14 | 195/R16C |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | No | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual, Three deal type |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Vinyl |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | — |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT (2015) vs Isuzu D-Max 2.5 (Single Cab) 4×2 MT Dsl (2015): which should you buy?
The Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT (₱671,000) is the better daily commuter for Filipino buyers due to its lower price and excellent fuel economy (19.32 km/l combined). The Isuzu D-Max 2.5 (₱762,000) excels as a heavy-duty workhorse with 280 Nm of torque and a diesel engine, but its higher cost and different drivetrain (RWD) make it less practical for most city users. Choose the Brio for budget-conscious city driving and the D-Max when hauling heavy loads. Both models offer a 100,000km/3-year warranty and are currently available.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT costs ₱671,000, while the Isuzu D-Max 2.5 costs ₱762,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Isuzu D-Max 2.5 delivers 109 PS vs. 100 PS for the Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT is more practical for daily commuting thanks to its 18.27 km/l city fuel economy and 5-speed automatic transmission.
What is the drivetrain?
The Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT uses FWD, while the Isuzu D-Max 2.5 uses RWD.