Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT (2015) Honda ₱671,000 | Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) Suzuki ₱763,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000kms/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1339cc | 1590cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 100 PS @ 6000 rpm | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm |
| Max Torque | 127 Nm @ 4800 rpm | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | 18.27 | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | 20.37 | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 19.32 | — |
| Emission Standard | Euro4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | MPV AUV |
| Segment | A | MPV |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 3+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 3610 | 4155 |
| Width (mm) | 1680 | 1655 |
| Height (mm) | 1485 | 1865 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2345 | 2625 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 975 | 1270 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 35 | 46 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Burgundy Red Pearl, Superior White, Silky Silver |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs |
| Front Wheels | 14x5 | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5 | 14 |
| Front Tires | 175/65 R14 | 185/60 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 175/65 R14 | 185/60 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | — |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | No | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, power and everyday practicality, the Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT (2015) edges out the Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) for most urban commuters. The Brio is cheaper at ₱671,000 versus ₱763,000, saving roughly ₱92,000. It also delivers higher peak power—100 PS compared to the APV’s 91 PS—while both produce the same maximum torque (127 Nm). The Brio’s fuel‑economy figures are better, with a combined 19.32 km/L versus the APV’s unspecified consumption, giving lower running costs in city traffic. Its 5‑speed automatic transmission adds convenience for stop‑and‑go driving, whereas the APV only offers a 5‑speed manual. The Brio’s compact hatchback body is suited to tight city streets and parking, while the APV’s larger MPV AUV layout (3+3+2 seats) provides more passenger capacity but at the expense of maneuverability and higher price. Both share the same warranty (100,000 km/3 years) and drivetrain layout (FWD for Brio, RWD for APV). If you need a budget‑friendly, fuel‑efficient, easy‑to‑drive car for daily commuting, the Brio is the better choice. If you regularly transport seven passengers or cargo and can afford the higher price, the APV’s larger interior may be justified.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT costs ₱671,000, which is about ₱92,000 less than the Suzuki APV Type II GA MT priced at ₱763,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Brio produces 100 PS at 6,000 rpm, while the APV delivers 91 PS at 5,750 rpm, making the Brio slightly more powerful.
Which car offers better fuel economy?
The Brio lists a combined fuel economy of 19.32 km/L; the APV’s fuel‑economy figures are not provided, so the Brio is the only model with known efficiency.
Which model is more practical for daily city commuting?
The Brio’s lower price, better fuel economy, automatic transmission and compact hatchback size make it more suited for everyday city driving, whereas the APV’s larger MPV layout is geared toward carrying more passengers.