Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT (2015) Honda ₱671,000 Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) Suzuki ₱763,000
Overview
Model Year 2015 2015
Warranty 100,000kms/3-years 100,000km/3-years
Availability Current Current
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 1339cc 1590cc
Valvetrain SOHC 16-valve SOHC 16-valve
Aspiration Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type Gas Gasoline
Max Power 100 PS @ 6000 rpm 91 PS @ 5750 rpm
Max Torque 127 Nm @ 4800 rpm 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm
Transmission 5-Speed A/T 5-Speed M/T
Drivetrain FWD RWD
Performance & Economy
0–60 mph no
0–100 km/h no
Top Speed no
Fuel Economy (City) 18.27
Fuel Economy (Highway) 20.37
Fuel Economy (Combined) 19.32
Emission Standard Euro4
Body & Dimensions
Body Type Hatchback MPV AUV
Segment A MPV
Construction Unibody Body on Frame
Doors 5 5
Seating Capacity 2+3 3+3+2
Length (mm) 3610 4155
Width (mm) 1680 1655
Height (mm) 1485 1865
Wheelbase (mm) 2345 2625
Curb Weight (kg) 975 1270
Fuel Tank (L) 35 46
Exterior Colors Burgundy Red Pearl, Superior White, Silky Silver
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension MacPherson w/ Stabilizer MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring
Rear Suspension Torsion Beam Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs
Front Wheels 14x5 14
Rear Wheels 14x5 14
Front Tires 175/65 R14 185/60 R14
Rear Tires 175/65 R14 185/60 R14
Front Brakes Disc Disc
Rear Brakes Drum Drum
Steering Type EPS
Steering Column tilt tilt
Tire Pressure Monitoring No No
Differential Lock No No
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) Yes No
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution Yes No
Brake Assist No No
Parking Sensors No No
Stability Control No No
Traction Control No No
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist No No
Hill Descent Control No No
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag Yes No
Knee Airbag No No
Passenger Airbag Yes No
Front Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Side Airbags No No
Engine Immobilizer Yes No
Security Alarm No No
Door Locking Central Locking Standard
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Manual Aircon Manual Aircon
Rear A/C Vents Yes No
Seat Material Fabric Fabric
Parking Brake Manual Manual
Key Type Keyless Entry Standard Key
Push-Button Start No No
Cruise Control No No
Multi-Info Display No No
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera No No
Auto Headlights No No
Power Windows Yes No
Power Seats No No
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode No No
Antenna no yes
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 4 2
Touchscreen No No
Navigation No No
Bluetooth No No
Apple CarPlay No No
Android Auto No No
USB Yes No
AUX Input Yes No
AM/FM Radio Yes Yes
CD Player No Yes
DVD Player No No
MP3 Playback Yes No
iPod Support Yes No
SD Card Slot No No
Lighting
Headlights Halogen Halogen
Fog Lights Yes Yes
Daytime Running Lights No No
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015): which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, power and everyday practicality, the Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT (2015) edges out the Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) for most urban commuters. The Brio is cheaper at ₱671,000 versus ₱763,000, saving roughly ₱92,000. It also delivers higher peak power—100 PS compared to the APV’s 91 PS—while both produce the same maximum torque (127 Nm). The Brio’s fuel‑economy figures are better, with a combined 19.32 km/L versus the APV’s unspecified consumption, giving lower running costs in city traffic. Its 5‑speed automatic transmission adds convenience for stop‑and‑go driving, whereas the APV only offers a 5‑speed manual. The Brio’s compact hatchback body is suited to tight city streets and parking, while the APV’s larger MPV AUV layout (3+3+2 seats) provides more passenger capacity but at the expense of maneuverability and higher price. Both share the same warranty (100,000 km/3 years) and drivetrain layout (FWD for Brio, RWD for APV). If you need a budget‑friendly, fuel‑efficient, easy‑to‑drive car for daily commuting, the Brio is the better choice. If you regularly transport seven passengers or cargo and can afford the higher price, the APV’s larger interior may be justified.

Frequently asked questions

Which model is cheaper?

The Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback AT costs ₱671,000, which is about ₱92,000 less than the Suzuki APV Type II GA MT priced at ₱763,000.

Which vehicle has more power?

The Brio produces 100 PS at 6,000 rpm, while the APV delivers 91 PS at 5,750 rpm, making the Brio slightly more powerful.

Which car offers better fuel economy?

The Brio lists a combined fuel economy of 19.32 km/L; the APV’s fuel‑economy figures are not provided, so the Brio is the only model with known efficiency.

Which model is more practical for daily city commuting?

The Brio’s lower price, better fuel economy, automatic transmission and compact hatchback size make it more suited for everyday city driving, whereas the APV’s larger MPV layout is geared toward carrying more passengers.